• Frank Benoit (14/14) Apr 14 2006 for a mixin it is important where the template is declared.
• Frank Benoit (7/7) Apr 14 2006 Now I can say, it is not my code that is illegal.
• Lars Ivar Igesund (2/4) Apr 14 2006 I think you can with build 2.10
• Derek Parnell (8/12) Apr 14 2006 Build now gives the files to the compiler in the same order that it
• Frank Benoit (2/6) Apr 14 2006 I need it on Linux. I read about actual problems with 2.10 on Linux in
• Derek Parnell (6/12) Apr 14 2006 I hope so. I'll have 2.11 out this weekend sometime.

Frank Benoit <keinfarbton nospam.xyz> writes:

for a mixin it is important where the template is declared.

mixin T!(int);
template T(t){
 t a;
}

does not work. Error: mixin forward reference to template.

In one module this is no problem. I can modify the sequence.
The problem comes, if the template and the mixin are in different modules.

I have a lot of templates. Working fine with mixins. Now I added the
"import A" to my file "B", and suddenly the compile fails in module "C".
In module "C" i also have an "import A" and there I use mixins with
templates out of A.

Why does the compile of C fail, when I modify B?

Is the template/mixin feature really stable?

Frank Benoit <keinfarbton nospam.xyz> writes:

Now I can say, it is not my code that is illegal.
I gave dmd with another source file order a try. Putting my module "B"
at the last position. And it works.

But now I know, the feature is not reliable. I will encounter more
problems in future. And I cannot tell /build/ in which order is should
list the source files :(

I will make a bug report.

Lars Ivar Igesund <larsivar igesund.net> writes:

Frank Benoit wrote:

 And I cannot tell /build/ in which order is should
 list the source files :(

I think you can with build 2.10

"Derek Parnell" <derek psych.ward> writes:

On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 03:11:28 +1000, Lars Ivar Igesund  
<larsivar igesund.net> wrote:

 Frank Benoit wrote:

 And I cannot tell /build/ in which order is should
 list the source files :(

 I think you can with build 2.10


Build now gives the files to the compiler in the same order that it  
encounters them. If you have a specific requirement to compile B before A  
then place B before A on the Build command line, or in a .brf file.

-- 
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia

Frank Benoit <keinfarbton nospam.xyz> writes:

 Build now gives the files to the compiler in the same order that it
 encounters them. If you have a specific requirement to compile B before
 A then place B before A on the Build command line, or in a .brf file.
 

I need it on Linux. I read about actual problems with 2.10 on Linux in
your forum. Are the problems solved?

"Derek Parnell" <derek psych.ward> writes:

On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 04:39:10 +1000, Frank Benoit <keinfarbton nospam.xyz>  
wrote:

 Build now gives the files to the compiler in the same order that it
 encounters them. If you have a specific requirement to compile B before
 A then place B before A on the Build command line, or in a .brf file.

 I need it on Linux. I read about actual problems with 2.10 on Linux in
 your forum. Are the problems solved?

I hope so. I'll have 2.11 out this weekend sometime.

-- 
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia