digitalmars.D - What's happening at dsource?
- Don Clugston (5/5) Mar 20 2006 I notice everything at dsource has been changed over to Trac. Which is
- Brad Anderson (13/19) Mar 20 2006 Two things are happening:
- jcc7 (5/17) Mar 20 2006 Is the idea to delete inactive projects or just put them way down at the...
- Brad Anderson (4/29) Mar 20 2006 Bottom of the list - someone could always revive code, so I don't want t...
- Johan Granberg (3/8) Mar 20 2006 Could it bee posible to put the dead project on a separat page labeld
- Brad Anderson (5/18) Mar 20 2006 I think you'll have filtering / sorting / searching options, so you coul...
- John Demme (13/33) Mar 20 2006 This sounds like a bad idea to me.
I notice everything at dsource has been changed over to Trac. Which is great, except ... most of the projects don't have Trac set up for them yet. Even as project admin, I don't seem to be able to do anything about it. Specifically, how can I get my MathExtra project visible again? With a dozen commits in the last week, it's most definitely not abandoned!
Mar 20 2006
Don Clugston wrote:I notice everything at dsource has been changed over to Trac. Which is great, except ... most of the projects don't have Trac set up for them yet. Even as project admin, I don't seem to be able to do anything about it. Specifically, how can I get my MathExtra project visible again? With a dozen commits in the last week, it's most definitely not abandoned!Two things are happening: 1. I'm compiling stats that will show a project activity level - thus weeding out the inactive / dormant projects. Your MathExtra project will certainly fare well with recent commits, and should be higher on the project list than the dead ones. 2. I was waiting on creating some Trac environments for all of the projects, because I want to weed out some of the inactive ones. I hadn't received a request to make a MathExtra Trac env, but maybe I hadn't asked specifically - the http://trac.dsource.org/ beta was a few months long, but you may not have seen the original notice. I'll get it set up soon. (Storms knocked out our T-1 this AM) BA
Mar 20 2006
In article <dvmegn$2u2j$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Brad Anderson says...Don Clugston wrote:Is the idea to delete inactive projects or just put them way down at the bottom of the list? Or is this just how you're deciding which ones would automatically get Trac? jcc7I notice everything at dsource has been changed over to Trac. Which is great, except ... most of the projects don't have Trac set up for them yet. Even as project admin, I don't seem to be able to do anything about it. Specifically, how can I get my MathExtra project visible again? With a dozen commits in the last week, it's most definitely not abandoned!Two things are happening: 1. I'm compiling stats that will show a project activity level - thus weeding out the inactive / dormant projects. Your MathExtra project will certainly fare well with recent commits, and should be higher on the project list than the dead ones.
Mar 20 2006
jcc7 wrote:In article <dvmegn$2u2j$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Brad Anderson says...Bottom of the list - someone could always revive code, so I don't want to remove any.Don Clugston wrote:Is the idea to delete inactive projects or just put them way down at the bottom of the list?I notice everything at dsource has been changed over to Trac. Which is great, except ... most of the projects don't have Trac set up for them yet. Even as project admin, I don't seem to be able to do anything about it. Specifically, how can I get my MathExtra project visible again? With a dozen commits in the last week, it's most definitely not abandoned!Two things are happening: 1. I'm compiling stats that will show a project activity level - thus weeding out the inactive / dormant projects. Your MathExtra project will certainly fare well with recent commits, and should be higher on the project list than the dead ones.Or is this just how you're deciding which ones would automatically get Trac?That, too.jcc7
Mar 20 2006
Brad Anderson wrote:Could it bee posible to put the dead project on a separat page labeld abandoned projects or somthing. his could greatly unclutter the site.Is the idea to delete inactive projects or just put them way down at the bottom of the list?Bottom of the list - someone could always revive code, so I don't want to remove any.
Mar 20 2006
Johan Granberg wrote:Brad Anderson wrote:I think you'll have filtering / sorting / searching options, so you could eliminate them if you'd like. I will also attempt to store these settings per user, so when you return, you'll still have the abandoned ones hidden. BACould it bee posible to put the dead project on a separat page labeld abandoned projects or somthing. his could greatly unclutter the site.Is the idea to delete inactive projects or just put them way down at the bottom of the list?Bottom of the list - someone could always revive code, so I don't want to remove any.
Mar 20 2006
Brad Anderson wrote:Johan Granberg wrote:This sounds like a bad idea to me. Me: "Yeah, the GDB-Patches project is on dsource.org.... I see it right there!" User:"It's on there on my screen... I don't get it!" In general, I prefer webpages to have the same content for each user to avoid issues like the above. It would also be nice to have a "ping" feature for the abandonware. For instance, I don't commit to gdb-patches very often, but the patch still works. Even if I don't make a commit for a month or two, the patch is still useful. It'd be nice if dsource.org sent me a message telling me that it's about to make gdb-patches abandonware and gave me the option of preventing that action. ~John DemmeBrad Anderson wrote:I think you'll have filtering / sorting / searching options, so you could eliminate them if you'd like. I will also attempt to store these settings per user, so when you return, you'll still have the abandoned ones hidden. BACould it bee posible to put the dead project on a separat page labeld abandoned projects or somthing. his could greatly unclutter the site.Is the idea to delete inactive projects or just put them way down at the bottom of the list?Bottom of the list - someone could always revive code, so I don't want to remove any.
Mar 20 2006