• S. Chancellor (3/3) Feb 12 2006 What was the consensus on DWT or whatever? While i'd love to read the
• Lars Ivar Igesund (3/7) Feb 12 2006 Hmm, you might check out the new newsgroup, digitalmars.D.dwt, but in
• John Demme (2/11) Feb 12 2006
• bobef (2/3) Feb 13 2006 Two ;]
• nick (3/8) Feb 12 2006 Some really good argument were made for DWT and it's probably going to

S. Chancellor <dnewsgr mephit.kicks-ass.org> writes:

What was the consensus on DWT or whatever?  While i'd love to read the 
100+ posts in that thread, can somebody give me the short answer?

-S.

Lars Ivar Igesund <larsivar igesund.net> writes:

S. Chancellor wrote:

 What was the consensus on DWT or whatever?  While i'd love to read the
 100+ posts in that thread, can somebody give me the short answer?
 
 -S.

Hmm, you might check out the new newsgroup, digitalmars.D.dwt, but in
general the consensus was 'maybe'.

John Demme <me teqdruid.com> writes:

Heh... In a room of 10 D users, how many opinions do you think you'd have?

Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:

 S. Chancellor wrote:
 
 What was the consensus on DWT or whatever?  While i'd love to read the
 100+ posts in that thread, can somebody give me the short answer?
 
 -S.

 
 Hmm, you might check out the new newsgroup, digitalmars.D.dwt, but in
 general the consensus was 'maybe'.

bobef <bobef lessequal.com> writes:

John Demme wrote:
 Heh... In a room of 10 D users, how many opinions do you think you'd have?

Two ;]

nick <nick.atamas gmail.com> writes:

S. Chancellor wrote:
 What was the consensus on DWT or whatever?  While i'd love to read the
 100+ posts in that thread, can somebody give me the short answer?
 
 -S.
 

Some really good argument were made for DWT and it's probably going to
be developed. So I would say "probably" rather than "maybe".