• AnOnlooker D.mars.com (18/18) Feb 06 2006 Hello all!
• Sean Kelly (3/6) Feb 06 2006 CLI has been an ISO/IEC standard since April 2003 (see 23271 and 23272).

AnOnlooker D.mars.com writes:

Hello all!

I've been watching this forum since the first "D" posting on slashdot last year,
and recently I see there is a question about what might suite "D" as it's best
direction for adoption by the masses.. Well, I thought about it and came up with
"Parrot".

Check here: (  page 43 it gets interesting)
http://www.jwcs.net/~jonathan/papers/2005-lpw-parrot-slides.pdf

I wonder since "Parrot" could well replace every script engine on the WEB as the
defacto developer's tool.. Could "D" function as it's backbone core? Could "D"
be the fast compiler they need in order to make thier project possible? 




open source use, but not the CLI. Is it possible once "D" become the strong

languages - thereby upsurping Microsoft at it's own game of web development
domination (via .NET)? 

Does anyone see the implications of "Parrot" using "D" as it's core engine? 


Could "Parrot" be "D"'s destiny? 


cheers!

Sean Kelly <sean f4.ca> writes:

AnOnlooker D.mars.com wrote:
 

 open source use, but not the CLI.

CLI has been an ISO/IEC standard since April 2003 (see 23271 and 23272).


Sean