• Chris (14/14) Nov 29 2005 As I've mentioned in a couple other threads, I am beginning to develop a...
• JT (2/16) Nov 29 2005 the front end is GPL
• Walter Bright (12/25) Nov 29 2005 toying
• Chris (3/30) Nov 29 2005 thanks.

Chris <Chris_member pathlink.com> writes:

As I've mentioned in a couple other threads, I am beginning to develop a D
compiler for that targets the .net framework. I have a little experience toying
with a much simpler programming language (that I created) which compiles to
msil. 

So far I have the lexer mostly done. basically what I did was look at the dmd


but used the code in lexer.c as a basis for mine. is that legal? I do have a
comment at the top that indicates the code is based on what Walter Bright wrote
in lexer.c.

currently I don't have a liscense for my code.. I'm just developing this alone
for now, and I won't be releasing anything, source code or binary, until it is
liscensed. when it is though, it will be open source. probably gpl.

Chris

JT <JT_member pathlink.com> writes:

In article <dmivmv$2j6u$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Chris says...
As I've mentioned in a couple other threads, I am beginning to develop a D
compiler for that targets the .net framework. I have a little experience toying
with a much simpler programming language (that I created) which compiles to
msil. 

So far I have the lexer mostly done. basically what I did was look at the dmd


but used the code in lexer.c as a basis for mine. is that legal? I do have a
comment at the top that indicates the code is based on what Walter Bright wrote
in lexer.c.

currently I don't have a liscense for my code.. I'm just developing this alone
for now, and I won't be releasing anything, source code or binary, until it is
liscensed. when it is though, it will be open source. probably gpl.

Chris

the front end is GPL

"Walter Bright" <newshound digitalmars.com> writes:

"Chris" <Chris_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:dmivmv$2j6u$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 As I've mentioned in a couple other threads, I am beginning to develop a D
 compiler for that targets the .net framework. I have a little experience

toying
 with a much simpler programming language (that I created) which compiles

to
 msil.

 So far I have the lexer mostly done. basically what I did was look at the

dmd



areas),
 but used the code in lexer.c as a basis for mine. is that legal? I do have

a
 comment at the top that indicates the code is based on what Walter Bright

wrote
 in lexer.c.

 currently I don't have a liscense for my code.. I'm just developing this

alone
 for now, and I won't be releasing anything, source code or binary, until

it is
 liscensed. when it is though, it will be open source. probably gpl.

If you do a derived work from the frond end, which is GPL, then the result
must be GPL as well. Doing a translation is considered a "derived work."

Chris <ctlajoie yahoo.com> writes:

On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 21:07:28 -0800, "Walter Bright"
<newshound digitalmars.com> wrote:
"Chris" <Chris_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:dmivmv$2j6u$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 As I've mentioned in a couple other threads, I am beginning to develop a D
 compiler for that targets the .net framework. I have a little experience

toying
 with a much simpler programming language (that I created) which compiles

to
 msil.

 So far I have the lexer mostly done. basically what I did was look at the

dmd



areas),
 but used the code in lexer.c as a basis for mine. is that legal? I do have

a
 comment at the top that indicates the code is based on what Walter Bright

wrote
 in lexer.c.

 currently I don't have a liscense for my code.. I'm just developing this

alone
 for now, and I won't be releasing anything, source code or binary, until

it is
 liscensed. when it is though, it will be open source. probably gpl.

If you do a derived work from the frond end, which is GPL, then the result
must be GPL as well. Doing a translation is considered a "derived work."

thanks.