• a lurker (6/9) Apr 29 2005 Shouldn't it be
• Walter (6/15) Apr 30 2005 this
• Stewart Gordon (11/23) May 04 2005 And even this looks wrong:

a lurker <a_member pathlink.com> writes:

I'm surprised i found this in the presentation on D that's available on this
site:

 Ever tried to declare in C
 a pointer to a pointer to an array of pointers to ints?
 int *(**p[]);

Shouldn't it be
int *(**p)[];
???

Whether this is known or not, i think an errata should be made available...

"Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> writes:

"a lurker" <a_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:d4usfo$26jq$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 I'm surprised i found this in the presentation on D that's available on

this
 site:

 Ever tried to declare in C
 a pointer to a pointer to an array of pointers to ints?
 int *(**p[]);

 Shouldn't it be
 int *(**p)[];
 ???

 Whether this is known or not, i think an errata should be made

available...

It's known. It was pointed out while I gave the talk at SDWest, and was
cause for much merriment.

Stewart Gordon <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> writes:

a lurker wrote:
 I'm surprised i found this in the presentation on D that's available on this
 site:
 
 Ever tried to declare in C
 a pointer to a pointer to an array of pointers to ints?
 int *(**p[]);

 
 Shouldn't it be
 int *(**p)[];
 ???
 
 Whether this is known or not, i think an errata should be made available...

And even this looks wrong:

     int *(*fp)();        // C
     int* function()* fp; // D

Should it be

     int* function() fp; // D

???

Stewart.

-- 
My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox.  Please keep replies on 
the 'group where everyone may benefit.