digitalmars.D - Build.exe
- kris (3/3) Mar 11 2005 I'd like to give Derek a round of applause for build.exe ~ it sure is a
- John Reimer (3/7) Mar 11 2005 Seconded! Good work, Derek!
- Nick Sabalausky (3/10) Mar 12 2005 I "third" it ;)
- G.Vidal (5/5) Mar 12 2005 Question to Derek:
- Derek Parnell (8/15) Mar 12 2005 I'll add it to the TODO list, but its not looking good. I don't really k...
- G.Vidal (5/18) Mar 13 2005 Nevermind. I'll use Make instead.
- John Reimer (3/28) Mar 13 2005 Yep, it's so universal that the multitude of make variants rarely are
- Derek Parnell (7/26) Mar 13 2005 No worries. Of course, if I had your problem I'd think about converting ...
- G.Vidal (2/4) Mar 14 2005 Sure I should. Go see the "Lemon parser generator" thread to see what i'...
- Carlos Santander B. (4/12) Mar 13 2005 Or dmc if version=DigitalMars.
- clayasaurus (2/6) Mar 12 2005 more joy all around, then ;)
- Paul Bonser (8/17) Mar 12 2005 Indeed. It builds my project just the same on Windows and Linux...with
- =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_F_Bj=F6rklund?= (8/14) Mar 12 2005 With the latest round of patches on the Build forum,
I'd like to give Derek a round of applause for build.exe ~ it sure is a great asset ... Woohoo! If it works on linux like it does on Win32, then more joy all around.
Mar 11 2005
kris wrote:I'd like to give Derek a round of applause for build.exe ~ it sure is a great asset ... Woohoo! If it works on linux like it does on Win32, then more joy all around.Seconded! Good work, Derek! -JJR
Mar 11 2005
"Nick Sabalausky" <z a.a> "John Reimer" <brk_6502 yahoo.com> wrote in message news:d0u5e7$1mdl$1 digitaldaemon.com...kris wrote:I "third" it ;)I'd like to give Derek a round of applause for build.exe ~ it sure is a great asset ... Woohoo! If it works on linux like it does on Win32, then more joy all around.Seconded! Good work, Derek! -JJR
Mar 12 2005
Question to Derek: If a project's using both D and C sources that must be linked together, could Build handle the C files and call gcc to compile them ? Would be cool. maybe it could parse a pragma(csource,module.c) or something ?
Mar 12 2005
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:48:17 +0100, G.Vidal wrote:Question to Derek: If a project's using both D and C sources that must be linked together, could Build handle the C files and call gcc to compile them ? Would be cool. maybe it could parse a pragma(csource,module.c) or something ?I'll add it to the TODO list, but its not looking good. I don't really know gcc, nor do I think I should hard code any gcc stuff in to build. But for now, its on the radar, okay? -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia 13/03/2005 10:30:20 AM
Mar 12 2005
Le Sun, 13 Mar 2005 10:32:15 +1100, Derek Parnell a écrit :On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:48:17 +0100, G.Vidal wrote:Nevermind. I'll use Make instead. It'll call gcc, dmd, and all my plugins. With dmd's pragma(lib,"") I don't need build no more. Other advantage, Make is universal.Question to Derek: If a project's using both D and C sources that must be linked together, could Build handle the C files and call gcc to compile them ? Would be cool. maybe it could parse a pragma(csource,module.c) or something ?I'll add it to the TODO list, but its not looking good. I don't really know gcc, nor do I think I should hard code any gcc stuff in to build. But for now, its on the radar, okay?
Mar 13 2005
G.Vidal wrote:Le Sun, 13 Mar 2005 10:32:15 +1100, Derek Parnell a écrit :Yep, it's so universal that the multitude of make variants rarely are compatible.On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:48:17 +0100, G.Vidal wrote:Nevermind. I'll use Make instead. It'll call gcc, dmd, and all my plugins. With dmd's pragma(lib,"") I don't need build no more. Other advantage, Make is universal.Question to Derek: If a project's using both D and C sources that must be linked together, could Build handle the C files and call gcc to compile them ? Would be cool. maybe it could parse a pragma(csource,module.c) or something ?I'll add it to the TODO list, but its not looking good. I don't really know gcc, nor do I think I should hard code any gcc stuff in to build. But for now, its on the radar, okay?
Mar 13 2005
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 22:01:53 +0100, G.Vidal wrote:Le Sun, 13 Mar 2005 10:32:15 +1100, Derek Parnell a écrit :No worries. Of course, if I had your problem I'd think about converting the C sources to D ;-) -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia 14/03/2005 8:28:35 AMOn Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:48:17 +0100, G.Vidal wrote:Nevermind. I'll use Make instead. It'll call gcc, dmd, and all my plugins. With dmd's pragma(lib,"") I don't need build no more.Question to Derek: If a project's using both D and C sources that must be linked together, could Build handle the C files and call gcc to compile them ? Would be cool. maybe it could parse a pragma(csource,module.c) or something ?I'll add it to the TODO list, but its not looking good. I don't really know gcc, nor do I think I should hard code any gcc stuff in to build. But for now, its on the radar, okay?
Mar 13 2005
No worries. Of course, if I had your problem I'd think about converting the C sources to D ;-)Sure I should. Go see the "Lemon parser generator" thread to see what i'm talking about..
Mar 14 2005
G.Vidal wrote:Question to Derek: If a project's using both D and C sources that must be linked together, could Build handle the C files and call gcc to compile them ? Would be cool. maybe it could parse a pragma(csource,module.c) or something ?Or dmc if version=DigitalMars. _______________________ Carlos Santander Bernal
Mar 13 2005
kris wrote:I'd like to give Derek a round of applause for build.exe ~ it sure is a great asset ... Woohoo! If it works on linux like it does on Win32, then more joy all around.more joy all around, then ;)
Mar 12 2005
clayasaurus wrote:kris wrote:Indeed. It builds my project just the same on Windows and Linux...with another. Well, excepting including the winsock library on Windows... -- -PIB -- "C++ also supports the notion of *friends*: cooperative classes that are permitted to see each other's private parts." - Grady BoochI'd like to give Derek a round of applause for build.exe ~ it sure is a great asset ... Woohoo! If it works on linux like it does on Win32, then more joy all around.more joy all around, then ;)
Mar 12 2005
clayasaurus wrote:With the latest round of patches on the Build forum, (see http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=52) it is starting to work with GDC - and Mac OS X too... Currently I still have to include a redundant DFLAGS of -I/opt/gdc/include/d for Build to find it, but that can be fixed with a few better default GDC settings. --andersI'd like to give Derek a round of applause for build.exe ~ it sure is a great asset ... Woohoo! If it works on linux like it does on Win32, then more joy all around.more joy all around, then ;)
Mar 12 2005