• pragma (19/19) Jan 27 2005 With the release of Dimple, it ocurred to me just how many parsers we ha...
• J C Calvarese (13/32) Jan 27 2005 Thanks for setting this up. I set up the originally page because people ...
• pragma (13/21) Jan 27 2005 Glad to be of service. Honestly, I was seeking to answer my own questio...
• J C Calvarese (6/10) Jan 27 2005 I think you mean this:
• Charles (21/48) Jan 27 2005 Im working on an interface for DMD , its mostly done but still running i...

pragma <pragma_member pathlink.com> writes:

With the release of Dimple, it ocurred to me just how many parsers we have
around here.  I went looking, and found the (rather stale) Wiki page:

http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GrammarParsers

I've updated this page on the wiki to include Dimple.  Those familiar with this
part of the wiki will now find a complete cross-reference with links to the
following parsing-based projects:

-Dimple
-Digc
-Dmake
-Dbuild
-Ddoc
-Dbindings (for parser.d and lexer.d)
-DGrammar
-Molt
-lr-lalr
-H2D

I'm pretty sure I've left some out.  If you have a parser based project (XML, D,
C, whatever) please post your project into the index on this wiki page.


- EricAnderton at yahoo

J C Calvarese <jcc7 cox.net> writes:

In article <ctbfg6$3031$1 digitaldaemon.com>, pragma says...
With the release of Dimple, it ocurred to me just how many parsers we have
around here.  I went looking, and found the (rather stale) Wiki page:

I think that stale was better than nothing. ;)

http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?GrammarParsers

I've updated this page on the wiki to include Dimple.  Those familiar with this
part of the wiki will now find a complete cross-reference with links to the
following parsing-based projects:

-Dimple
-Digc
-Dmake
-Dbuild
-Ddoc
-Dbindings (for parser.d and lexer.d)
-DGrammar
-Molt
-lr-lalr
-H2D

Thanks for setting this up. I set up the originally page because people kept on
asking where an ANTLR grammar was and it's easier to put the answers on a wiki
page than keep on looking it up in the newsgroups. At least, it's easier for me.

Of course, you've made the page a lot more useful now than what I did. It looks
good.

I'm pretty sure I've left some out.  If you have a parser based project (XML, D,
C, whatever) please post your project into the index on this wiki page.

There's already some XML parsers here:
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?AllLibraries/XmlLibraries

Isn't parsing XML a fairly different project than parsing a language like D or
Java? We can put them all on the same page if that's the consensus, but it seems
different enough to me to warrant a separate list.

- EricAnderton at yahoo

jcc7

pragma <pragma_member pathlink.com> writes:

In article <ctbkta$5u6$1 digitaldaemon.com>, J C Calvarese says...
Thanks for setting this up. I set up the originally page because people kept on
asking where an ANTLR grammar was and it's easier to put the answers on a wiki
page than keep on looking it up in the newsgroups. At least, it's easier for me.

Of course, you've made the page a lot more useful now than what I did. It looks
good.

Glad to be of service.  Honestly, I was seeking to answer my own question: why
aren't people sharing more source?  Obviously, there's more than one answer, but
this should help with those few who want to get a running start at a new
project.

Plus I've been studying/researching parsing technologies for months now, so it
was easier for me to see it all in one place.

Isn't parsing XML a fairly different project than parsing a language like D or
Java? We can put them all on the same page if that's the consensus, but it 
 seems different enough to me to warrant a separate list.

You're right.  XML is a very different task from generic parsing and D parsers
(after all, XML is supposed to be one of the easier grammars to target).

JC, since you're probably following this thread, wasn't there a more recent
header to D-file converter project mentioned here in the NG?  I went looking but
couldn't find it.

- EricAnderton at yahoo

J C Calvarese <jcc7 cox.net> writes:

In article <ctbn04$8ad$1 digitaldaemon.com>, pragma says...
JC, since you're probably following this thread, wasn't there a more recent
header to D-file converter project mentioned here in the NG?  I went looking but
couldn't find it.

I think you mean this:
http://www.digitalmars.com/drn-bin/wwwnews?digitalmars.D/14676

I don't think it has a website yet (I didn't notice one). And it's name will
probably change since there's the separate project at dsource called "H2D".

- EricAnderton at yahoo

jcc7

"Charles" <no email.com> writes:

 Glad to be of service.  Honestly, I was seeking to answer my own question:

why
 aren't people sharing more source?  Obviously, there's more than one

answer, but
 this should help with those few who want to get a running start at a new
 project.

Im working on an interface for DMD , its mostly done but still running it
through some tests , and trying to understand some parts of the frontend (
like why some Dsymbol's Loc structs are invalid :( ) .  I'll post a link to
it when im done case anyone wants it .

Charlie


"pragma" <pragma_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:ctbn04$8ad$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 In article <ctbkta$5u6$1 digitaldaemon.com>, J C Calvarese says...
Thanks for setting this up. I set up the originally page because people


kept on
asking where an ANTLR grammar was and it's easier to put the answers on a


wiki
page than keep on looking it up in the newsgroups. At least, it's easier


for me.
Of course, you've made the page a lot more useful now than what I did. It


looks
good.

 Glad to be of service.  Honestly, I was seeking to answer my own question:

why
 aren't people sharing more source?  Obviously, there's more than one

answer, but
 this should help with those few who want to get a running start at a new
 project.

 Plus I've been studying/researching parsing technologies for months now,

so it
 was easier for me to see it all in one place.

Isn't parsing XML a fairly different project than parsing a language like


D or
Java? We can put them all on the same page if that's the consensus, but


it
 seems different enough to me to warrant a separate list.

 You're right.  XML is a very different task from generic parsing and D

parsers
 (after all, XML is supposed to be one of the easier grammars to target).

 JC, since you're probably following this thread, wasn't there a more

recent
 header to D-file converter project mentioned here in the NG?  I went

looking but
 couldn't find it.

 - EricAnderton at yahoo