• Jan-Eric Duden (11/11) Apr 27 2004 Hi!
• J Anderson (4/7) Apr 27 2004 This is already an alias in phobos for bit, and I like it that way.
• Jan-Eric Duden (8/20) Apr 27 2004 Some more thoughts about virtual as a reserved keyword:
• School (2/3) Apr 28 2004 That's quite good.

"Jan-Eric Duden" <jeduden whisset.com> writes:

Hi!

I just wanted to suggest that some more keywords should be reserved.
First suggestions:
- property     -->possible future application: to explicitly declare
variables as properties
- bool            -->possible future application: boolean type
- virtual          --> not sure about this one...
the current keyword list is here:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/lex.html#keyword
-- 
Jan-Eric Duden

J Anderson <REMOVEanderson badmama.com.au> writes:

Jan-Eric Duden wrote:

Hi!

- bool            -->possible future application: boolean type
  

This is already an alias in phobos for bit, and I like it that way.

-- 
-Anderson: http://badmama.com.au/~anderson/

"Jan-Eric Duden" <jeduden whisset.com> writes:

 - virtual          --> not sure about this one...

Some more thoughts about virtual as a reserved keyword:
I don't think that virtual should be used in D, but
I think that people coming from C++ might get confused when they see
variables and functions called virtual.
-- 
Jan-Eric Duden

"Jan-Eric Duden" <jeduden whisset.com> wrote in message
news:c6l6r3$l0k$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Hi!

 I just wanted to suggest that some more keywords should be reserved.
 First suggestions:
 - property     -->possible future application: to explicitly declare
 variables as properties
 - bool            -->possible future application: boolean type
 - virtual          --> not sure about this one...
 the current keyword list is here:
 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/lex.html#keyword
 -- 
 Jan-Eric Duden

School <itsnotvalid-news yahoo.com.hk> writes:

Jan-Eric Duden wrote (partly):
 - property     -->possible future application: to explicitly declare variables
as properties

That's quite good.