digitalmars.D - What do you think of Lisp, guys?
- Samium Gromoff (6/6) Dec 18 2004 There is a notion that before attempting to make something new it is
- Zz (6/12) Dec 18 2004 Amazing Language and very flexible.
- Matthias Becker (4/9) Dec 18 2004 Hmm, LISP is a dynamicaly typed language that offers a mix between funct...
- David Medlock (5/16) Dec 18 2004 Lisp is the most programmable programming language(to quote Paul Graham
- Helmut Leitner (9/18) Dec 19 2004 I think that Lisp is theoretically more interesting than practically.
- =?iso-8859-1?Q?Robert_M._M=FCnch?= (7/9) Dec 23 2004 The better Lisp: www.rebol.com
- Charles Hixson (7/16) Mar 19 2005 Nope. Rebol is a langauge being maintained by one company, and
There is a notion that before attempting to make something new it is useful to take a look at the best of the stuff already done. Naturally Lisp falls into the category of such `best' things to use as inspirational material/feature reference. So the question is -- what are your (as a community) reflexions about Lisp? (this is a crosspost from the old D newsgroup)
Dec 18 2004
Amazing Language and very flexible. Cons: Large runtime. Good systems are expensive (Allegro, LispWorks) "Samium Gromoff" <Samium_member pathlink.com> wrote in message news:cq1ukp$27qj$1 digitaldaemon.com...There is a notion that before attempting to make something new it is useful to take a look at the best of the stuff already done. Naturally Lisp falls into the category of such `best' things to use as inspirational material/feature reference. So the question is -- what are your (as a community) reflexions aboutLisp?(this is a crosspost from the old D newsgroup)
Dec 18 2004
There is a notion that before attempting to make something new it is useful to take a look at the best of the stuff already done. Naturally Lisp falls into the category of such `best' things to use as inspirational material/feature reference.Hmm, LISP is a dynamicaly typed language that offers a mix between functional and implerativ programming. D is a staticaly typed language imperativ lanaguage.So the question is -- what are your (as a community) reflexions about Lisp??
Dec 18 2004
Samium Gromoff wrote:There is a notion that before attempting to make something new it is useful to take a look at the best of the stuff already done. Naturally Lisp falls into the category of such `best' things to use as inspirational material/feature reference. So the question is -- what are your (as a community) reflexions about Lisp? (this is a crosspost from the old D newsgroup)Lisp is the most programmable programming language(to quote Paul Graham www.paulgraham.com ). I think a version of Scheme in D would be a good project. Perhaps porting a Java package such as JScheme (www.norvig.com)
Dec 18 2004
Samium Gromoff wrote:There is a notion that before attempting to make something new it is useful to take a look at the best of the stuff already done. Naturally Lisp falls into the category of such `best' things to use as inspirational material/feature reference. So the question is -- what are your (as a community) reflexions about Lisp? (this is a crosspost from the old D newsgroup)I think that Lisp is theoretically more interesting than practically. Lisp tends - like C++ - to support multiple paradigmas and so fails to give a straightforward framework to think and program within. Lisp environments tend to be monolythical big things, like Smalltalk, Good Lisp implementations tend to be expensive for commercial use. In total: Lisp is good, Lisp will remain in a niche market, Lisp had its chance and its place in history.
Dec 19 2004
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 18:58:33 +0000 (UTC), Samium Gromoff <Samium_member pathlink.com> wrote:So the question is -- what are your (as a community) reflexions about Lisp?The better Lisp: www.rebol.com -- Robert M. Münch Management & IT Freelancer http://www.robertmuench.de
Dec 23 2004
Robert M. Münch wrote:On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 18:58:33 +0000 (UTC), Samium Gromoff <Samium_member pathlink.com> wrote:Nope. Rebol is a langauge being maintained by one company, and they're keeping it secret. That won't be a viable contender as a useable language for anything serious until there is at least a second source, and preferable a GPL fork. OTOH, if you like that, you might give Logo a look. Several variants of that exist.So the question is -- what are your (as a community) reflexions about Lisp?The better Lisp: www.rebol.com
Mar 19 2005