• Walter (2/2) Oct 21 2004 Fixed debug info bug.
• Charlie (8/10) Oct 22 2004 Quick question,
• Sean Kelly (5/10) Oct 22 2004 Yes, though at the moment you have to modify Phobos to do so. This is a...
• Walter (6/20) Oct 22 2004 Right now, the way to do it is to modify internal\dmain2.d and comment o...
• Stewart Gordon (4/12) Oct 25 2004 At least some debuggers are supposed to be able to catch exceptions
• Stewart Gordon (5/8) Oct 25 2004 And there was me thinking you had lots of fixes lined up as there had

"Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> writes:

Fixed debug info bug.

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

Charlie <Charlie_member pathlink.com> writes:

Quick question,

On most of the standard exceptions ( divide by zero , Access violation ) D
catches it and die's with the appropriate error message , is it possible to
re-throw this , or eliminate it so that debuggers and the like will catch it and
we're able to view the debug info ?

Or what is everyones thoughts ?

Charlie

In article <cla6i8$25aa$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...
Fixed debug info bug.

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

Sean Kelly <sean f4.ca> writes:

In article <clbdrs$es8$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Charlie says...
Quick question,

On most of the standard exceptions ( divide by zero , Access violation ) D
catches it and die's with the appropriate error message , is it possible to
re-throw this , or eliminate it so that debuggers and the like will catch it and
we're able to view the debug info ?

Yes, though at the moment you have to modify Phobos to do so.  This is actually
something I'm currently working on, and Matthew has a proposal on Exceptions in
the works as well, so stay tuned.


Sean

"Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> writes:

Right now, the way to do it is to modify internal\dmain2.d and comment out
the catch.

"Charlie" <Charlie_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:clbdrs$es8$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Quick question,

 On most of the standard exceptions ( divide by zero , Access violation ) D
 catches it and die's with the appropriate error message , is it possible

to
 re-throw this , or eliminate it so that debuggers and the like will catch

it and
 we're able to view the debug info ?

 Or what is everyones thoughts ?

 Charlie

 In article <cla6i8$25aa$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...
Fixed debug info bug.

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

Stewart Gordon <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> writes:

Charlie wrote:
 Quick question,
 
 On most of the standard exceptions ( divide by zero , Access violation ) D
 catches it and die's with the appropriate error message , is it possible to
 re-throw this , or eliminate it so that debuggers and the like will catch it
and
 we're able to view the debug info ?
 
 Or what is everyones thoughts ?

At least some debuggers are supposed to be able to catch exceptions 
where and when they're thrown.

Stewart.

Stewart Gordon <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> writes:

Walter wrote:

 Fixed debug info bug.
 
 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

And there was me thinking you had lots of fixes lined up as there had 
been no updates for a month.  But I see you hadn't even found this....

http://www.digitalmars.com/drn-bin/wwwnews?digitalmars.D.bugs/1850

Stewart.