www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D - DMD 0.102 release

reply "Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> writes:
I haven't gotten very far with the MIID list yet, this is mostly just
compiler bugs. I'm going to be out for a few days, and I wanted to get this
out first.

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
Sep 21 2004
next sibling parent reply Ant <duitoolkit yahoo.ca> writes:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:19:15 -0700, Walter wrote:


 I haven't gotten very far with the MIID list yet, this is mostly just
 compiler bugs. I'm going to be out for a few days, and I wanted to get this
 out first.
 
 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html


DUI and tests compile and run
leds compiles but terminates with

"
Error: circular initialization dependency with module Leds
"

Anybody knows what's that?
can it be 

 "Fixed private module construction order." ?

What should I look for?

Ant
Sep 21 2004
parent reply "Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> writes:
"Ant" <duitoolkit yahoo.ca> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.09.22.03.15.15.767739 yahoo.ca...

 On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:19:15 -0700, Walter wrote:


 I haven't gotten very far with the MIID list yet, this is mostly just
 compiler bugs. I'm going to be out for a few days, and I wanted to get




this

 out first.

 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html


 DUI and tests compile and run
 leds compiles but terminates with

 "
 Error: circular initialization dependency with module Leds
 "

 Anybody knows what's that?
 can it be

  "Fixed private module construction order." ?

 What should I look for?


Two modules that import each other, and each has static initializers.
Sep 21 2004
parent reply Ant <duitoolkit yahoo.ca> writes:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 20:24:58 -0700, Walter wrote:


 
 "Ant" <duitoolkit yahoo.ca> wrote in message

 "
 Error: circular initialization dependency with module Leds
 "


 Two modules that import each other, and each has static initializers.


thanks, I'll check that (might take awhile...)

Ant
Sep 21 2004
parent reply Ant <duitoolkit yahoo.ca> writes:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 23:21:32 -0400, Ant wrote:


 On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 20:24:58 -0700, Walter wrote:
 

 
 "Ant" <duitoolkit yahoo.ca> wrote in message

 "
 Error: circular initialization dependency with module Leds
 "


 Two modules that import each other, and each has static initializers.


 
 thanks, I'll check that (might take awhile...)
 


It wasn't critical that my static vars/consts were static
so I just made then instance variables and it pass that 
"circular init" constraint.

I know there was a lengthy discussion about this
I'll read it before complaining - but this doesn't smell very well :)

see ya when you're back, i guess.

Ant
Sep 21 2004
parent "Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> writes:
"Ant" <duitoolkit yahoo.ca> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.09.22.03.33.49.466003 yahoo.ca...

 On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 23:21:32 -0400, Ant wrote:


 On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 20:24:58 -0700, Walter wrote:


 "Ant" <duitoolkit yahoo.ca> wrote in message

 "
 Error: circular initialization dependency with module Leds
 "


 Two modules that import each other, and each has static initializers.


 thanks, I'll check that (might take awhile...)


 It wasn't critical that my static vars/consts were static
 so I just made then instance variables and it pass that
 "circular init" constraint.

 I know there was a lengthy discussion about this
 I'll read it before complaining - but this doesn't smell very well :)


The only way the runtime can tell who depends on what is the imports. The
rule is that the imported modules must be initialized before the module that
imports them. With two modules importing each other, this cannot be
resolved.
Sep 21 2004
prev sibling next sibling parent reply Deja Augustine <deja scratch-ware.net> writes:
DAMN YOU! :D

I just got D.NET caught up to 0.101 :)

Walter wrote:


 I haven't gotten very far with the MIID list yet, this is mostly just
 compiler bugs. I'm going to be out for a few days, and I wanted to get this
 out first.
 
 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
Sep 21 2004
parent reply "Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> writes:
If there are some changes I can make to the source that would make folding
in the newer versions easier, I'd be happy to make them.

"Deja Augustine" <deja scratch-ware.net> wrote in message
news:cir09u$13ga$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 DAMN YOU! :D

 I just got D.NET caught up to 0.101 :)

 Walter wrote:


 I haven't gotten very far with the MIID list yet, this is mostly just
 compiler bugs. I'm going to be out for a few days, and I wanted to get




this

 out first.

 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
Sep 21 2004
parent Deja Augustine <deja scratch-ware.net> writes:
Unfortunately, I've had to modify the front-end to a rather severe 
degree in order to move, store and interface with the various Managed 
C++ constructs necessary.

WinDiff is my friend :)

Thank you for the offer, though
-Deja


Walter wrote:


 If there are some changes I can make to the source that would make folding
 in the newer versions easier, I'd be happy to make them.
 
 "Deja Augustine" <deja scratch-ware.net> wrote in message
 news:cir09u$13ga$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 

DAMN YOU! :D

I just got D.NET caught up to 0.101 :)

Walter wrote:



I haven't gotten very far with the MIID list yet, this is mostly just
compiler bugs. I'm going to be out for a few days, and I wanted to get




 
 this
 

out first.

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
Sep 21 2004
prev sibling next sibling parent reply "Carlos Santander B." <carlos8294 msn.com> writes:
"Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> escribió en el mensaje 
news:ciqo2o$i1p$1 digitaldaemon.com...
|I haven't gotten very far with the MIID list yet, this is mostly just
| compiler bugs. I'm going to be out for a few days, and I wanted to get this
| out first.
|
| http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
|
|
|

Did something change regarding casting? I can't send a bug report because 
there're just so many things to reduce it (including the use of mixins), but I 
something like this used to compile:

void foo(void * x) { ... }
class A
{
    void bar () {
        foo( cast(void*) this );
    }
}

(this trimmed down example actually compiles, but the real one doesn't)
Now I get "can't cast from A to void *". Did something change?

-----------------------
Carlos Santander Bernal
Sep 22 2004
parent reply "Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> writes:
"Carlos Santander B." <carlos8294 msn.com> wrote in message
news:citg4t$c1p$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 Did something change regarding casting? I can't send a bug report because
 there're just so many things to reduce it (including the use of mixins),


but I

 something like this used to compile:

 void foo(void * x) { ... }
 class A
 {
     void bar () {
         foo( cast(void*) this );
     }
 }

 (this trimmed down example actually compiles, but the real one doesn't)
 Now I get "can't cast from A to void *". Did something change?


In 0.99, implicit casts to void were removed.
Sep 23 2004
parent "Carlos Santander B." <carlos8294 msn.com> writes:
"Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> escribió en el mensaje
news:civ4sg$1tjl$2 digitaldaemon.com
| "Carlos Santander B." <carlos8294 msn.com> wrote in message
| news:citg4t$c1p$1 digitaldaemon.com...
|| Did something change regarding casting? I can't send a bug report because
|| there're just so many things to reduce it (including the use of mixins),
| but I
|| something like this used to compile:
||
|| void foo(void * x) { ... }
|| class A
|| {
||     void bar () {
||         foo( cast(void*) this );
||     }
|| }
||
|| (this trimmed down example actually compiles, but the real one doesn't)
|| Now I get "can't cast from A to void *". Did something change?
|
| In 0.99, implicit casts to void were removed.

But this is to void *, and it compiled until 0.101

-----------------------
Carlos Santander Bernal
Sep 23 2004
prev sibling parent "Lynn Allan" <l_d_allan adelphia.net> writes:
"Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> wrote in message
news:ciqo2o$i1p$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 I haven't gotten very far with the MIID list yet, this is mostly just
 compiler bugs. I'm going to be out for a few days, and I wanted to get


this

 out first.

 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html


zlib uncompress seems to work fine. THX!
Sep 23 2004