• dogtired (1/1) Sep 20 2004 I can't find it, neither can dmd.
• h3r3tic (2/3) Sep 20 2004 Don't. How about std.conv ? :)
• Sjoerd van Leent (2/8) Sep 21 2004 std.string, there it is
• h3r3tic (2/14) Sep 21 2004 std.conv is better :>
• Sjoerd van Leent (7/26) Sep 21 2004 It is a string function, but I still think the name is odd. It is a C

dogtired <dogtired_member pathlink.com> writes:

I can't find it, neither can dmd.

h3r3tic <h3r3tic dev.null> writes:

dogtired wrote:
 I can't find it, neither can dmd.

Don't. How about std.conv ? :)

Sjoerd van Leent <svanleent wanadoo.nl> writes:

h3r3tic wrote:
 dogtired wrote:
 
 I can't find it, neither can dmd.

 
 
 Don't. How about std.conv ? :)

std.string, there it is

h3r3tic <h3r3tic dev.null> writes:

Sjoerd van Leent wrote:
 h3r3tic wrote:
 
 dogtired wrote:

 I can't find it, neither can dmd.



 Don't. How about std.conv ? :)

 
 
 std.string, there it is

std.conv is better :>

Sjoerd van Leent <svanleent wanadoo.nl> writes:

h3r3tic wrote:
 Sjoerd van Leent wrote:
 
 h3r3tic wrote:

 dogtired wrote:

 I can't find it, neither can dmd.




 Don't. How about std.conv ? :)



 std.string, there it is

 
 
 std.conv is better :>

It is a string function, but I still think the name is odd. It is a C 
name out of the prehistory. I think that /int toInt(char[])/ and /char[] 
toString(int)/ would be more appropriate.

I think it should be in the std.string module since it has to do with 
strings. Although you can argue that it also has to do with other 
variables. :p