c++.idde - Output window, why?
- Chris (13/13) Mar 04 2002 I have noticed that there seems to be a setting that is controlling the ...
- Jan Knepper (5/18) Mar 04 2002 Can you mail me a .jpg screen dump?
-
Chris
(4/26)
Mar 05 2002
On Mon, 04 Mar 2002 18:58:16 -0500, Jan Knepper
I have noticed that there seems to be a setting that is controlling the way the output window displays the build process. But can't seem to find how. Machine 1: Win2000 Pro, used to have SC++ 7.5 with patches. Got me DM++, deinstalled SC++, loaded DM++. Works fine. Machine 2: Also W2000 Pro, clean install. Moved DM++ over from machine 1. Works fine. But... when I build from Machine 1, I see only sc .... lines during the build (and errors), but one machine 2 I see sc.exe followed by scpp.exe lines. I prefer the way machine 1 is displaying, but would like that one 2. Anybody any idea what is causing this (and it isn't explorer's way of showing extensions, which is on on both machines). Chris
Mar 04 2002
Can you mail me a .jpg screen dump? <Prnt+Scrn> Thanks! Jan Chris wrote:I have noticed that there seems to be a setting that is controlling the way the output window displays the build process. But can't seem to find how. Machine 1: Win2000 Pro, used to have SC++ 7.5 with patches. Got me DM++, deinstalled SC++, loaded DM++. Works fine. Machine 2: Also W2000 Pro, clean install. Moved DM++ over from machine 1. Works fine. But... when I build from Machine 1, I see only sc .... lines during the build (and errors), but one machine 2 I see sc.exe followed by scpp.exe lines. I prefer the way machine 1 is displaying, but would like that one 2. Anybody any idea what is causing this (and it isn't explorer's way of showing extensions, which is on on both machines). Chris
Mar 04 2002
On Mon, 04 Mar 2002 18:58:16 -0500, Jan Knepper <jan smartsoft.cc> wrote: Jan, two mails have been sent, hope you can tell me more.... Regards, ChrisCan you mail me a .jpg screen dump? <Prnt+Scrn> Thanks! Jan Chris wrote:I have noticed that there seems to be a setting that is controlling the way the output window displays the build process. But can't seem to find how. Machine 1: Win2000 Pro, used to have SC++ 7.5 with patches. Got me DM++, deinstalled SC++, loaded DM++. Works fine. Machine 2: Also W2000 Pro, clean install. Moved DM++ over from machine 1. Works fine. But... when I build from Machine 1, I see only sc .... lines during the build (and errors), but one machine 2 I see sc.exe followed by scpp.exe lines. I prefer the way machine 1 is displaying, but would like that one 2. Anybody any idea what is causing this (and it isn't explorer's way of showing extensions, which is on on both machines). Chris
Mar 05 2002
jeikum <jeikum_member pathlink.com> In article <7kfa8u0ogc56kuaargtns8nhqv0da17f2t 4ax.com>, Chris says...On Mon, 04 Mar 2002 18:58:16 -0500, Jan Knepper <jan smartsoft.cc> wrote: Jan, two mails have been sent, hope you can tell me more.... Regards, ChrisCan you mail me a .jpg screen dump? <Prnt+Scrn> Thanks! Jan Chris wrote:I have noticed that there seems to be a setting that is controlling the way the output window displays the build process. But can't seem to find how. Machine 1: Win2000 Pro, used to have SC++ 7.5 with patches. Got me DM++, deinstalled SC++, loaded DM++. Works fine. Machine 2: Also W2000 Pro, clean install. Moved DM++ over from machine 1. Works fine. But... when I build from Machine 1, I see only sc .... lines during the build (and errors), but one machine 2 I see sc.exe followed by scpp.exe lines. I prefer the way machine 1 is displaying, but would like that one 2. Anybody any idea what is causing this (and it isn't explorer's way of showing extensions, which is on on both machines). Chris
Dec 27 2003
I the same question and have searched for the answer to this message in the newsgroup but can't find it. Did this ever get resolved? In article <7kfa8u0ogc56kuaargtns8nhqv0da17f2t 4ax.com>, Chris says...On Mon, 04 Mar 2002 18:58:16 -0500, Jan Knepper <jan smartsoft.cc> wrote: Jan, two mails have been sent, hope you can tell me more.... Regards, ChrisCan you mail me a .jpg screen dump? <Prnt+Scrn> Thanks! Jan Chris wrote:I have noticed that there seems to be a setting that is controlling the way the output window displays the build process. But can't seem to find how. Machine 1: Win2000 Pro, used to have SC++ 7.5 with patches. Got me DM++, deinstalled SC++, loaded DM++. Works fine. Machine 2: Also W2000 Pro, clean install. Moved DM++ over from machine 1. Works fine. But... when I build from Machine 1, I see only sc .... lines during the build (and errors), but one machine 2 I see sc.exe followed by scpp.exe lines. I prefer the way machine 1 is displaying, but would like that one 2. Anybody any idea what is causing this (and it isn't explorer's way of showing extensions, which is on on both machines). Chris
Dec 27 2003
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 18:18:49 +0000 (UTC), jeikum <jeikum_member pathlink.com> wrote:I the same question and have searched for the answer to this message in the newsgroup but can't find it. Did this ever get resolved?It's been a long time, but AFAIK it was because of a space in one of the path's. I solved this by sharing the DM dir and then conecting the share to new drive letter (to lose the space).In article <7kfa8u0ogc56kuaargtns8nhqv0da17f2t 4ax.com>, Chris says...On Mon, 04 Mar 2002 18:58:16 -0500, Jan Knepper <jan smartsoft.cc> wrote: Jan, two mails have been sent, hope you can tell me more.... Regards, ChrisCan you mail me a .jpg screen dump? <Prnt+Scrn> Thanks! Jan Chris wrote:I have noticed that there seems to be a setting that is controlling the way the output window displays the build process. But can't seem to find how. Machine 1: Win2000 Pro, used to have SC++ 7.5 with patches. Got me DM++, deinstalled SC++, loaded DM++. Works fine. Machine 2: Also W2000 Pro, clean install. Moved DM++ over from machine 1. Works fine. But... when I build from Machine 1, I see only sc .... lines during the build (and errors), but one machine 2 I see sc.exe followed by scpp.exe lines. I prefer the way machine 1 is displaying, but would like that one 2. Anybody any idea what is causing this (and it isn't explorer's way of showing extensions, which is on on both machines). Chris
Mar 20 2004