www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

c++.idde - IDDE from Symantec CD + DMC++

reply "Ingvaldur Sigurjonsson" <ingi elit.se> writes:
Hi

I am a registrered owner of Symantec C++ 7.2x - 7.5. Before that I had my
company buying Symantec C++ 6.0 and before that Zortech C++ 3.x...

I was happy to see the existance of DMC++, and I therefor really would like
to play around with it, integrated into the IDDE from my SC 7.5x.

Can I just copy the contents of DM to SC directory structure to make it work
? (Thereby overwriting some tools in sc\bin, files in sc\include and sc\lib
... ).

What action do I need to take to make them work together ?

Yes a makefile and VIM is a perfect match, but for nostalgic reasons... (Who
came up with the crazy idea to deliver MicroEmacs on the CD anyway ? )

If this turns out to be a fun 'playground' I guarantee that I'll buy the
DMC++ 9.x with the updated IDDE, Debugger and with support of STLPort 4.5x
 or greater ).

Best regards
- Ingvaldur
Feb 11 2002
parent reply "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:
Just give it a try!

"Ingvaldur Sigurjonsson" <ingi elit.se> wrote in message
news:a49ivh$dqn$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 Hi

 I am a registrered owner of Symantec C++ 7.2x - 7.5. Before that I had my
 company buying Symantec C++ 6.0 and before that Zortech C++ 3.x...

 I was happy to see the existance of DMC++, and I therefor really would


like

 to play around with it, integrated into the IDDE from my SC 7.5x.

 Can I just copy the contents of DM to SC directory structure to make it


work

 ? (Thereby overwriting some tools in sc\bin, files in sc\include and


sc\lib

 ... ).

 What action do I need to take to make them work together ?

 Yes a makefile and VIM is a perfect match, but for nostalgic reasons...


(Who

 came up with the crazy idea to deliver MicroEmacs on the CD anyway ? )

 If this turns out to be a fun 'playground' I guarantee that I'll buy the
 DMC++ 9.x with the updated IDDE, Debugger and with support of STLPort 4.5x
  or greater ).

 Best regards
 - Ingvaldur
Feb 11 2002
parent reply "Ingvaldur Sigurjonsson" <ingi elit.se> writes:
I did not manage to build a console based testprogram which includes both
map and string.

The compiler choked on template parameter ... ( bool __threads,... )

compiling it from the command line works though.

I'll probably stick to VIM and Makefiles, though it would have been nice
to...

- Ingvaldur

Walter <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message
news:a4aea4$o62$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 Just give it a try!

 "Ingvaldur Sigurjonsson" <ingi elit.se> wrote in message
 news:a49ivh$dqn$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 Hi

 I am a registrered owner of Symantec C++ 7.2x - 7.5. Before that I had




my

 company buying Symantec C++ 6.0 and before that Zortech C++ 3.x...

 I was happy to see the existance of DMC++, and I therefor really would


 like

 to play around with it, integrated into the IDDE from my SC 7.5x.

 Can I just copy the contents of DM to SC directory structure to make it


 work

 ? (Thereby overwriting some tools in sc\bin, files in sc\include and


 sc\lib

 ... ).

 What action do I need to take to make them work together ?

 Yes a makefile and VIM is a perfect match, but for nostalgic reasons...


 (Who

 came up with the crazy idea to deliver MicroEmacs on the CD anyway ? )

 If this turns out to be a fun 'playground' I guarantee that I'll buy the
 DMC++ 9.x with the updated IDDE, Debugger and with support of STLPort




4.5x

  or greater ).

 Best regards
 - Ingvaldur
Feb 12 2002
parent reply "Ingvaldur Sigurjonsson" <ingi elit.se> writes:
Ok, not being able to let the IDDE go so easely, I went back to square 1 and
restored my SC++ 7.5 installation, downloaded and installed the DMC++ 8.1b5
(The Symantec 7.5 drop in replacement).

And I also installed the STLport (HEAD !).

With this setup I managed to build my STL based console application.

But I have a few questions :-)

What work is being done on the DMC++ to be able to build newer versions of
STL (like STLport v4.5x) ? (template specialisation).

Are there many changes to the IDDE and Resource Editor you supply on DM CD
compared to the Symantec v7.5 ?

regards
- Ingvaldur

Ingvaldur Sigurjonsson <ingi elit.se> wrote in message
news:a4c75p$1h42$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 I did not manage to build a console based testprogram which includes both
 map and string.

 The compiler choked on template parameter ... ( bool __threads,... )

 compiling it from the command line works though.

 I'll probably stick to VIM and Makefiles, though it would have been nice
 to...

 - Ingvaldur

 Walter <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message
 news:a4aea4$o62$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 Just give it a try!

 "Ingvaldur Sigurjonsson" <ingi elit.se> wrote in message
 news:a49ivh$dqn$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 Hi

 I am a registrered owner of Symantec C++ 7.2x - 7.5. Before that I had




 my

 company buying Symantec C++ 6.0 and before that Zortech C++ 3.x...

 I was happy to see the existance of DMC++, and I therefor really would


 like

 to play around with it, integrated into the IDDE from my SC 7.5x.

 Can I just copy the contents of DM to SC directory structure to make






it

 work

 ? (Thereby overwriting some tools in sc\bin, files in sc\include and


 sc\lib

 ... ).

 What action do I need to take to make them work together ?

 Yes a makefile and VIM is a perfect match, but for nostalgic






reasons...

 (Who

 came up with the crazy idea to deliver MicroEmacs on the CD anyway ? )

 If this turns out to be a fun 'playground' I guarantee that I'll buy






the

 DMC++ 9.x with the updated IDDE, Debugger and with support of STLPort




 4.5x

  or greater ).

 Best regards
 - Ingvaldur
Feb 12 2002
parent reply "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:
DMC++ will continue to be improved to be compatible with the standards. If
you're comfortable with the Symantec IDDE, then the Digital Mars one should
work well for you. Why not get the DMC++ CD? The CD is loaded with 300Mb of
stuff, as opposed to the 2.8Mb free version.

www.digitalmars.com/shop.html

It's only $25. If you don't like it, return it for a refund. Best of all,
DMC++ doesn't need to be installed. Run it right off the CD. It doesn't
munge up your system registry and spray files all over your disk.

-Walter

"Ingvaldur Sigurjonsson" <ingi elit.se> wrote in message
news:a4cfcb$1k7r$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 Ok, not being able to let the IDDE go so easely, I went back to square 1


and

 restored my SC++ 7.5 installation, downloaded and installed the DMC++


8.1b5

 (The Symantec 7.5 drop in replacement).

 And I also installed the STLport (HEAD !).

 With this setup I managed to build my STL based console application.

 But I have a few questions :-)

 What work is being done on the DMC++ to be able to build newer versions of
 STL (like STLport v4.5x) ? (template specialisation).

 Are there many changes to the IDDE and Resource Editor you supply on DM CD
 compared to the Symantec v7.5 ?

 regards
 - Ingvaldur

 Ingvaldur Sigurjonsson <ingi elit.se> wrote in message
 news:a4c75p$1h42$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 I did not manage to build a console based testprogram which includes




both

 map and string.

 The compiler choked on template parameter ... ( bool __threads,... )

 compiling it from the command line works though.

 I'll probably stick to VIM and Makefiles, though it would have been nice
 to...

 - Ingvaldur

 Walter <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message
 news:a4aea4$o62$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 Just give it a try!

 "Ingvaldur Sigurjonsson" <ingi elit.se> wrote in message
 news:a49ivh$dqn$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 Hi

 I am a registrered owner of Symantec C++ 7.2x - 7.5. Before that I








had

 my

 company buying Symantec C++ 6.0 and before that Zortech C++ 3.x...

 I was happy to see the existance of DMC++, and I therefor really








would

 like

 to play around with it, integrated into the IDDE from my SC 7.5x.

 Can I just copy the contents of DM to SC directory structure to make






 it

 work

 ? (Thereby overwriting some tools in sc\bin, files in sc\include and


 sc\lib

 ... ).

 What action do I need to take to make them work together ?

 Yes a makefile and VIM is a perfect match, but for nostalgic






 reasons...

 (Who

 came up with the crazy idea to deliver MicroEmacs on the CD anyway








? )

 If this turns out to be a fun 'playground' I guarantee that I'll buy






 the

 DMC++ 9.x with the updated IDDE, Debugger and with support of








STLPort

 4.5x

  or greater ).

 Best regards
 - Ingvaldur
Feb 13 2002
parent reply Cesar Rabak <csrabak uol.com.br> writes:
Walter wrote:

 
 DMC++ will continue to be improved to be compatible with the standards. If
 you're comfortable with the Symantec IDDE, then the Digital Mars one should
 work well for you. Why not get the DMC++ CD? The CD is loaded with 300Mb of
 stuff, as opposed to the 2.8Mb free version.
 
 www.digitalmars.com/shop.html
 
 It's only $25. If you don't like it, return it for a refund. Best of all,
 DMC++ doesn't need to be installed. Run it right off the CD. It doesn't
 munge up your system registry and spray files all over your disk.
 


Walter,

Have we solved the Resource Editor need of having a DLL copied to the
machine's SYSTEM directory?


-- 
Cesar Rabak
GNU/Linux User 52247.
Get counted: http://counter.li.org/
Feb 13 2002
parent "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:
"Cesar Rabak" <csrabak uol.com.br> wrote in message
news:3C6ACF3E.F2F12231 uol.com.br...

 Walter wrote:

 DMC++ will continue to be improved to be compatible with the standards.




If

 you're comfortable with the Symantec IDDE, then the Digital Mars one




should

 work well for you. Why not get the DMC++ CD? The CD is loaded with 300Mb




of

 stuff, as opposed to the 2.8Mb free version.

 www.digitalmars.com/shop.html

 It's only $25. If you don't like it, return it for a refund. Best of




all,

 DMC++ doesn't need to be installed. Run it right off the CD. It doesn't
 munge up your system registry and spray files all over your disk.


 Walter,

 Have we solved the Resource Editor need of having a DLL copied to the
 machine's SYSTEM directory?


No. But there usually already is one in the system directory.
Feb 14 2002