www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

c++.dos - direct screen I/O with disp

reply "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:
I revamped the disp documentation so it is semi-usable now.

www.digitalmars.com/rtl/disp.html
Apr 12 2002
parent reply Adrian Cole <Adrian_member pathlink.com> writes:
In article <a983fj$2mim$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...

I revamped the disp documentation so it is semi-usable now.

www.digitalmars.com/rtl/disp.html


Are the same services available through int86, interrupt 0x10? I'd like to have
a solution that was buildable by other compilers, also.
Jun 27 2002
parent reply Jan Knepper <jan smartsoft.cc> writes:
 Are the same services available through int86, interrupt 0x10? I'd like to have
 a solution that was buildable by other compilers, also.


#ifdef __DMC__
    // use disp
#else
    // use other.
#endif

Jan
Jun 27 2002
parent reply Adrian Cole <Adrian_member pathlink.com> writes:
In article <3D1B6217.BABAB728 smartsoft.cc>, Jan Knepper says...

 Are the same services available through int86, interrupt 0x10? I'd like to have
 a solution that was buildable by other compilers, also.


#ifdef __DMC__
    // use disp
#else
    // use other.
#endif

Jan


I take it that means the answer is no. I think I'll just use embedded assembler
instead, because I don't want the nightmare of maintaining changes in two
different places. Your compiler does support embedded assembler, doesn't it?
Jun 27 2002
parent "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:
"Adrian Cole" <Adrian_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:afftpo$2nq7$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 I take it that means the answer is no. I think I'll just use embedded


assembler

 instead, because I don't want the nightmare of maintaining changes in two
 different places. Your compiler does support embedded assembler, doesn't


it?

It sure does!

-Walter
Jul 01 2002