c++.dos.32-bits - FG with DOSX
- Rajiv Bhagwat (6/6) Jan 03 2002 I wanted to upgrade some of the older 16 bit apps to 32 bit using -mx mo...
- Roland (7/13) Jan 04 2002 There was already a discussion about FlashTek in c++.dos directory, subj...
- Rajiv Bhagwat (12/26) Jan 08 2002 Sorry Roland, even after setting Synchronization setting to 'All Message...
- Jan Knepper (4/36) Jan 09 2002 Weird!
- Walter (9/47) Jan 09 2002 I'm having the same wierd problems.
- Roland (4/36) Jan 10 2002 I don't understand the problem.
- Rajiv Bhagwat (16/54) Jan 10 2002 My simple question is : does anyone have 'fg_dosx.zip' ?
- Roland (5/13) Jan 10 2002 may be (i hope) you can ask
- Jan Knepper (6/21) Jan 10 2002 Somebody gave me the originals of the FG disks a long time ago...
- Rajiv Bhagwat (9/36) Jan 10 2002 Thanks, Roland and Jan. I will proceed from the references.
- Rajiv Bhagwat (7/48) Jan 11 2002 Jan, downloading and installing the cx.obj and x32v.lib solved my proble...
I wanted to upgrade some of the older 16 bit apps to 32 bit using -mx mode. I have fg.h and fgp.lib required for this. I got a few linker errors. After going through the readme, they have asked to download fg_dosx.zip from their BBS. (All this is dated 1994, so no BBS would exist today.) Does anyone have this file, required to use FlashTeks Flash Graphics in dosx mode?
Jan 03 2002
Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit :I wanted to upgrade some of the older 16 bit apps to 32 bit using -mx mode. I have fg.h and fgp.lib required for this. I got a few linker errors. After going through the readme, they have asked to download fg_dosx.zip from their BBS. (All this is dated 1994, so no BBS would exist today.) Does anyone have this file, required to use FlashTeks Flash Graphics in dosx mode?There was already a discussion about FlashTek in c++.dos directory, subject: FlashGraphics. There seems to be a problem. I don't know if it is solved. good luck Roland
Jan 04 2002
Sorry Roland, even after setting Synchronization setting to 'All Messages' I am getting only 3 messages in c++.dos. If you have the previous message, kindly give me the short summary. (And any conclusions!) Thanks. - Rajiv "Roland" <rv ronetech.com> wrote in message news:3C3576DA.53AFB81B ronetech.com...Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit :mode.I wanted to upgrade some of the older 16 bit apps to 32 bit using -mxAfterI have fg.h and fgp.lib required for this. I got a few linker errors.theirgoing through the readme, they have asked to download fg_dosx.zip fromdosxBBS. (All this is dated 1994, so no BBS would exist today.) Does anyone have this file, required to use FlashTeks Flash Graphics insubject:mode?There was already a discussion about FlashTek in c++.dos directory,FlashGraphics. There seems to be a problem. I don't know if it is solved. good luck Roland
Jan 08 2002
Weird! I am sure you're not the only one using MSO... Jan Rajiv Bhagwat wrote:Sorry Roland, even after setting Synchronization setting to 'All Messages' I am getting only 3 messages in c++.dos. If you have the previous message, kindly give me the short summary. (And any conclusions!) Thanks. - Rajiv "Roland" <rv ronetech.com> wrote in message news:3C3576DA.53AFB81B ronetech.com...Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit :mode.I wanted to upgrade some of the older 16 bit apps to 32 bit using -mxAfterI have fg.h and fgp.lib required for this. I got a few linker errors.theirgoing through the readme, they have asked to download fg_dosx.zip fromdosxBBS. (All this is dated 1994, so no BBS would exist today.) Does anyone have this file, required to use FlashTeks Flash Graphics insubject:mode?There was already a discussion about FlashTek in c++.dos directory,FlashGraphics. There seems to be a problem. I don't know if it is solved. good luck Roland
Jan 09 2002
I'm having the same wierd problems. "Jan Knepper" <jan smartsoft.cc> wrote in message news:3C3C6EC4.C578B3F2 smartsoft.cc...Weird! I am sure you're not the only one using MSO... Jan Rajiv Bhagwat wrote:Messages' ISorry Roland, even after setting Synchronization setting to 'Allanyam getting only 3 messages in c++.dos. If you have the previous message, kindly give me the short summary. (Andusing -mxconclusions!) Thanks. - Rajiv "Roland" <rv ronetech.com> wrote in message news:3C3576DA.53AFB81B ronetech.com...Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit :I wanted to upgrade some of the older 16 bit apps to 32 biterrors.mode.I have fg.h and fgp.lib required for this. I got a few linkerfromAftergoing through the readme, they have asked to download fg_dosx.zipintheirBBS. (All this is dated 1994, so no BBS would exist today.) Does anyone have this file, required to use FlashTeks Flash Graphicsdosxsubject:mode?There was already a discussion about FlashTek in c++.dos directory,FlashGraphics. There seems to be a problem. I don't know if it is solved. good luck Roland
Jan 09 2002
Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit :Sorry Roland, even after setting Synchronization setting to 'All Messages' I am getting only 3 messages in c++.dos. If you have the previous message, kindly give me the short summary. (And any conclusions!) Thanks. - Rajiv "Roland" <rv ronetech.com> wrote in message news:3C3576DA.53AFB81B ronetech.com...I don't understand the problem. Do you want i send all the messages in c++.dos concerning FG ? RolandRajiv Bhagwat a écrit :mode.I wanted to upgrade some of the older 16 bit apps to 32 bit using -mxAfterI have fg.h and fgp.lib required for this. I got a few linker errors.theirgoing through the readme, they have asked to download fg_dosx.zip fromdosxBBS. (All this is dated 1994, so no BBS would exist today.) Does anyone have this file, required to use FlashTeks Flash Graphics insubject:mode?There was already a discussion about FlashTek in c++.dos directory,FlashGraphics. There seems to be a problem. I don't know if it is solved. good luck Roland
Jan 10 2002
My simple question is : does anyone have 'fg_dosx.zip' ? As the file was freely available for download from the maker's BBS, I assume I am not breaking any laws by asking it. If there were any methods discussed (in the newsgroup) so that the I can use FGP.LIB without this file for -mx compiles, that would be helpful. Otherwise, I assume that the file would still be required for linking the missing symbols. - Rajiv "Roland" <rv ronetech.com> wrote in message news:3C3D54D1.83955689 ronetech.com...Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit :Messages' ISorry Roland, even after setting Synchronization setting to 'Allanyam getting only 3 messages in c++.dos. If you have the previous message, kindly give me the short summary. (Andusing -mxconclusions!) Thanks. - Rajiv "Roland" <rv ronetech.com> wrote in message news:3C3576DA.53AFB81B ronetech.com...Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit :I wanted to upgrade some of the older 16 bit apps to 32 biterrors.mode.I have fg.h and fgp.lib required for this. I got a few linkerfromAftergoing through the readme, they have asked to download fg_dosx.zipintheirBBS. (All this is dated 1994, so no BBS would exist today.) Does anyone have this file, required to use FlashTeks Flash GraphicsdosxI don't understand the problem. Do you want i send all the messages in c++.dos concerning FG ? Rolandsubject:mode?There was already a discussion about FlashTek in c++.dos directory,FlashGraphics. There seems to be a problem. I don't know if it is solved. good luck Roland
Jan 10 2002
Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit :My simple question is : does anyone have 'fg_dosx.zip' ?not me.As the file was freely available for download from the maker's BBS, I assume I am not breaking any laws by asking it. If there were any methods discussed (in the newsgroup) so that the I can use FGP.LIB without this file for -mx compiles, that would be helpful. Otherwise, I assume that the file would still be required for linking the missing symbols. - Rajivmay be (i hope) you can askSomebody gave me the originals of the FG disks a long time ago... I've got an FGDISK1.zip and FGDISK2.zip. I think this stuff is originally copyrighted by one of the Huffman brothers... I think it was Joe Huffman, Doug Huffman, http://www.dosextender.com/ , did the DOSX stuff. Roland wrote:Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit :My simple question is : does anyone have 'fg_dosx.zip' ?not me.As the file was freely available for download from the maker's BBS, I assume I am not breaking any laws by asking it. If there were any methods discussed (in the newsgroup) so that the I can use FGP.LIB without this file for -mx compiles, that would be helpful. Otherwise, I assume that the file would still be required for linking the missing symbols. - Rajivmay be (i hope) you can askThanks, Roland and Jan. I will proceed from the references. - Rajiv "Jan Knepper" <jan smartsoft.cc> wrote in message news:3C3DDF72.5BF9D6C smartsoft.cc...Somebody gave me the originals of the FG disks a long time ago... I've got an FGDISK1.zip and FGDISK2.zip. I think this stuff is originally copyrighted by one of the Huffmanbrothers...I think it was Joe Huffman, Doug Huffman, http://www.dosextender.com/ ,did theDOSX stuff. Roland wrote:assumeRajiv Bhagwat a écrit :My simple question is : does anyone have 'fg_dosx.zip' ?not me.As the file was freely available for download from the maker's BBS, Ican useI am not breaking any laws by asking it. If there were any methods discussed (in the newsgroup) so that the ItheFGP.LIB without this file for -mx compiles, that would be helpful. Otherwise, I assume that the file would still be required for linkingmissing symbols. - Rajivmay be (i hope) you can askJan, downloading and installing the cx.obj and x32v.lib solved my problem! Thanks for the 'on-the-dot' diagnosis!! - Rajiv "Rajiv Bhagwat" <dataflow vsnl.com> wrote in message news:a1m0t9$1l12$1 digitaldaemon.com...Thanks, Roland and Jan. I will proceed from the references. - Rajiv "Jan Knepper" <jan smartsoft.cc> wrote in message news:3C3DDF72.5BF9D6C smartsoft.cc...ISomebody gave me the originals of the FG disks a long time ago... I've got an FGDISK1.zip and FGDISK2.zip. I think this stuff is originally copyrighted by one of the Huffmanbrothers...I think it was Joe Huffman, Doug Huffman, http://www.dosextender.com/ ,did theDOSX stuff. Roland wrote:Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit :My simple question is : does anyone have 'fg_dosx.zip' ?not me.As the file was freely available for download from the maker's BBS,assumelinkingcan useI am not breaking any laws by asking it. If there were any methods discussed (in the newsgroup) so that the IFGP.LIB without this file for -mx compiles, that would be helpful. Otherwise, I assume that the file would still be required forthemissing symbols. - Rajivmay be (i hope) you can ask