• Walter (2/2) May 23 2003 More boost fixes.
• John Fletcher (7/9) May 29 2003 I have tried out the previous test programs with the new beta. There is
• Richard Grant (15/20) May 29 2003 Ok, dmc does not like the inline keyword after the return type.. it does...

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:

More boost fixes.

http://www.digitalmars.com/download/freecompiler.html

John Fletcher <J.P.Fletcher aston.ac.uk> writes:

Walter wrote:

 More boost fixes.

 http://www.digitalmars.com/download/freecompiler.html

I have tried out the previous test programs with the new beta.  There is
no change in the first one at all.  There is also no change in the
second one, but I have revised the source file to include the template
for cons, as noted by Richard Grant.  The input and output files are
appended.

John

Richard Grant <fractal clark.net> writes:

In article <3ED5CB55.45D48A77 aston.ac.uk>, John Fletcher says...

I have tried out the previous test programs with the new beta.  There is
no change in the first one at all.  There is also no change in the
second one, but I have revised the source file to include the template
for cons, as noted by Richard Grant.  The input and output files are
appended.

Ok, dmc does not like the inline keyword after the return type.. it does like
the inline keyword before the return type. If you change the code to the
following it compiles.

/* template<class T1>
tuple<typename convert_to_plain_by_default<T1>::type> inline make_tuple(const
T1& t1) {
return tuple<typename convert_to_plain_by_default<T1>::type> (t1);
}; */

template<class T1>
inline tuple<typename convert_to_plain_by_default<T1>::type>
make_tuple(const T1& t1) {
return tuple<typename convert_to_plain_by_default<T1>::type> (t1);
};

Richard