c++.announce - DM C/C++ 8.45
- Walter Bright (25/25) Sep 08 2005 DMC++ now passes 100% of the tests in Dr. Brian Malloy's test suite at
- Jan Knepper (9/44) Sep 08 2005 Dude!
- jay.a.carlson gmail.com (4/29) Sep 08 2005 Outstanding Walter!!! Truly Outstanding!!!
- Matthew (5/30) Sep 10 2005 Does that mean 8.45 now throws bad_alloc on op new?
- Walter Bright (6/7) Sep 10 2005 No. I'm working on a way to do it that would be backwards compatible wit...
- Matthew (7/16) Sep 11 2005 Ok
DMC++ now passes 100% of the tests in Dr. Brian Malloy's test suite at
Conformance Comparison of C++ compilers: Oct 2003 published in Dr. Dobb's
http://www.cs.clemson.edu/~malloy/projects/ddj2/ddj2.html
http://www.digitalmars.com/compiler.htm
For comparison, here's the table from the article on how the other compilers
did:
Compiler Clause Results
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Fails % Passed
edg 3.2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 99.70
Comeau 4.3.2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 99.55
Intel 7.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 3 99.55
PGCC 4.1.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 3 0 6 99.11
VC++ 7.1 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 1 2 5 0 12 98.22
gcc 3.3 1 0 0 2 3 5 1 0 6 0 1 6 1 26 96.15
Borland 6.0 0 0 1 0 9 2 1 0 8 3 3 21 1 49 92.73
Watcom 1.0 11 1 4 2 15 4 4 1 9 10 6 76 2 145 78.49
Total Cases 65 2 18 13 76 81 37 33 45 50 54 188 12 674
For DMC++:
DMC++ 8.45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100.00
Dr. Malloy created the test suite by adapting the 'book' examples from the
C++ Standard. Not reflected in these tests are the fact that DMC++ also
passes 100% of the 'book' preprocessor examples.
No, DMC++ still doesn't do export <g>.
Many thanks to all who helped with this release. It's an important milestone
for DMC++.
Sep 08 2005
Jan Knepper <jan smartsoft.us>
Dude!
You ***ROCK***
Jan
Walter Bright wrote:
DMC++ now passes 100% of the tests in Dr. Brian Malloy's test suite at
Conformance Comparison of C++ compilers: Oct 2003 published in Dr. Dobb's
http://www.cs.clemson.edu/~malloy/projects/ddj2/ddj2.html
http://www.digitalmars.com/compiler.htm
For comparison, here's the table from the article on how the other compilers
did:
Compiler Clause Results
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Fails % Passed
edg 3.2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 99.70
Comeau 4.3.2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 99.55
Intel 7.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 3 99.55
PGCC 4.1.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 3 0 6 99.11
VC++ 7.1 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 1 2 5 0 12 98.22
gcc 3.3 1 0 0 2 3 5 1 0 6 0 1 6 1 26 96.15
Borland 6.0 0 0 1 0 9 2 1 0 8 3 3 21 1 49 92.73
Watcom 1.0 11 1 4 2 15 4 4 1 9 10 6 76 2 145 78.49
Total Cases 65 2 18 13 76 81 37 33 45 50 54 188 12 674
For DMC++:
DMC++ 8.45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100.00
Dr. Malloy created the test suite by adapting the 'book' examples from the
C++ Standard. Not reflected in these tests are the fact that DMC++ also
passes 100% of the 'book' preprocessor examples.
No, DMC++ still doesn't do export <g>.
Many thanks to all who helped with this release. It's an important milestone
for DMC++.
--
ManiaC++
Jan Knepper
But as for me and my household, we shall use Mozilla...
www.mozilla.org
Sep 08 2005
Outstanding Walter!!! Truly Outstanding!!!
/r
Jay
In article <dfqbfj$gm1$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Walter Bright says...
DMC++ now passes 100% of the tests in Dr. Brian Malloy's test suite at
Conformance Comparison of C++ compilers: Oct 2003 published in Dr. Dobb's
http://www.cs.clemson.edu/~malloy/projects/ddj2/ddj2.html
http://www.digitalmars.com/compiler.htm
For comparison, here's the table from the article on how the other compilers
did:
Compiler Clause Results
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Fails % Passed
edg 3.2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 99.70
Comeau 4.3.2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 99.55
Intel 7.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 3 99.55
PGCC 4.1.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 3 0 6 99.11
VC++ 7.1 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 1 2 5 0 12 98.22
gcc 3.3 1 0 0 2 3 5 1 0 6 0 1 6 1 26 96.15
Borland 6.0 0 0 1 0 9 2 1 0 8 3 3 21 1 49 92.73
Watcom 1.0 11 1 4 2 15 4 4 1 9 10 6 76 2 145 78.49
Total Cases 65 2 18 13 76 81 37 33 45 50 54 188 12 674
For DMC++:
DMC++ 8.45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100.00
Dr. Malloy created the test suite by adapting the 'book' examples from the
C++ Standard. Not reflected in these tests are the fact that DMC++ also
passes 100% of the 'book' preprocessor examples.
No, DMC++ still doesn't do export <g>.
Many thanks to all who helped with this release. It's an important milestone
for DMC++.
Sep 08 2005
Does that mean 8.45 now throws bad_alloc on op new? "Walter Bright" <newshound digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:dfqbfj$gm1$1 digitaldaemon.com...DMC++ now passes 100% of the tests in Dr. Brian Malloy's test suite at Conformance Comparison of C++ compilers: Oct 2003 published in Dr. Dobb's http://www.cs.clemson.edu/~malloy/projects/ddj2/ddj2.html http://www.digitalmars.com/compiler.htm For comparison, here's the table from the article on how the othercompilersdid: Compiler Clause Results 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Fails % Passed edg 3.2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 99.70 Comeau 4.3.2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 99.55 Intel 7.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 3 99.55 PGCC 4.1.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 3 0 6 99.11 VC++ 7.1 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 1 2 5 0 12 98.22 gcc 3.3 1 0 0 2 3 5 1 0 6 0 1 6 1 26 96.15 Borland 6.0 0 0 1 0 9 2 1 0 8 3 3 21 1 49 92.73 Watcom 1.0 11 1 4 2 15 4 4 1 9 10 6 76 2 145 78.49 Total Cases 65 2 18 13 76 81 37 33 45 50 54 188 12 674 For DMC++: DMC++ 8.45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100.00 Dr. Malloy created the test suite by adapting the 'book' examples from the C++ Standard. Not reflected in these tests are the fact that DMC++ also passes 100% of the 'book' preprocessor examples. No, DMC++ still doesn't do export <g>. Many thanks to all who helped with this release. It's an importantmilestonefor DMC++.
Sep 10 2005
"Matthew" <matthew hat.stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message news:dfvjnv$psg$1 digitaldaemon.com...Does that mean 8.45 now throws bad_alloc on op new?No. I'm working on a way to do it that would be backwards compatible with the NULL return behavior. I'll not claim that 8.45 has reached 100% conformance; it hasn't. In the meantime, global operator new can be overridden to throw.
Sep 10 2005
"Walter Bright" <newshound digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:dg06lh$1mk8$3 digitaldaemon.com..."Matthew" <matthew hat.stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message news:dfvjnv$psg$1 digitaldaemon.com...Ok btw, I'm upgrading the STLSoft libs wrt 0x0845, and am very pleased to find a lot of things that DMC++ has caught up with several aspects where is has previously lagged behind the crowd. There're still plenty of areas for improvement, though. ;-)Does that mean 8.45 now throws bad_alloc on op new?No. I'm working on a way to do it that would be backwards compatible with the NULL return behavior. I'll not claim that 8.45 has reached 100% conformance; it hasn't. In the meantime, global operator new can be overridden to throw.
Sep 11 2005