c++ - templates
- Edward F. Sowell (7/7) Nov 23 2001 Back in January I was trying to compile my code with DC++ 8.0B2, but
- Walter (4/11) Nov 23 2001 There have been many improvements in template support in the 8.2x series...
- reiter nomadics.com (Mac Reiter) (13/28) Jan 21 2002 Would I be correct in my belief that "template member functions" are
- Walter (3/35) Jan 21 2002 Yes, you'd be correct! I will get them implemented, though. -Walter
Back in January I was trying to compile my code with DC++ 8.0B2, but finally gave up because "Basically, you've run into the fact that DMC++ does not have the templates implemented as proposed in the latest standards." (Jan Knepper) Has this issue been addressed yet? Ed Sowell
Nov 23 2001
There have been many improvements in template support in the 8.2x series, but they aren't perfect yet. -Walter "Edward F. Sowell" <sowelled home.com> wrote in message news:3BFE7AD8.44E23681 home.com...Back in January I was trying to compile my code with DC++ 8.0B2, but finally gave up because "Basically, you've run into the fact that DMC++ does not have the templates implemented as proposed in the latest standards." (Jan Knepper) Has this issue been addressed yet? Ed Sowell
Nov 23 2001
Would I be correct in my belief that "template member functions" are part of the "not perfect yet" category? This is the most precise term I have been able to find for templatized functions as members of a class (which may or may not be a template itself). 'vector' has a constructor that is templatized to take a interator class, as well as several other templatized members. Just curious, 'coz it's keeping me from testing DMC on my current project. (And yes, I do understand that templates are amazingly hairy things and that the developer list for DMC is pretty short...) Mac On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 10:29:59 -0800, "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote:There have been many improvements in template support in the 8.2x series, but they aren't perfect yet. -Walter "Edward F. Sowell" <sowelled home.com> wrote in message news:3BFE7AD8.44E23681 home.com...Back in January I was trying to compile my code with DC++ 8.0B2, but finally gave up because "Basically, you've run into the fact that DMC++ does not have the templates implemented as proposed in the latest standards." (Jan Knepper) Has this issue been addressed yet? Ed Sowell
Jan 21 2002
"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> Yes, you'd be correct! I will get them implemented, though. -Walter "Mac Reiter" <reiter nomadics.com> wrote in message news:3c4c6e33.336720909 news.digitalmars.com...Would I be correct in my belief that "template member functions" are part of the "not perfect yet" category? This is the most precise term I have been able to find for templatized functions as members of a class (which may or may not be a template itself). 'vector' has a constructor that is templatized to take a interator class, as well as several other templatized members. Just curious, 'coz it's keeping me from testing DMC on my current project. (And yes, I do understand that templates are amazingly hairy things and that the developer list for DMC is pretty short...) Mac On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 10:29:59 -0800, "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote:There have been many improvements in template support in the 8.2x series, but they aren't perfect yet. -Walter "Edward F. Sowell" <sowelled home.com> wrote in message news:3BFE7AD8.44E23681 home.com...Back in January I was trying to compile my code with DC++ 8.0B2, but finally gave up because "Basically, you've run into the fact that DMC++ does not have the templates implemented as proposed in the latest standards." (Jan Knepper) Has this issue been addressed yet? Ed Sowell
Jan 21 2002