c++ - Pipe problem
- Matthew Wilson (5/5) Dec 12 2003 It seems that any version later than 8.37 cannot be piped to another
- Walter (3/8) Dec 12 2003 If you're using my grep.exe, it doesn't read from stdin, hence the messa...
- Matthew Wilson (8/17) Dec 12 2003 Ah. It must be different paths. (I normally use the Borland one)
-
Walter
(4/6)
Dec 13 2003
Nobody seems to care
. It's a simple program I wrote because none of ... - Matthew Wilson (3/8) Dec 13 2003 I'd find it useful.
- Walter (3/12) Dec 14 2003 Sure!
- Matthew Wilson (2/14) Dec 15 2003 Does your enthusiasm for the adding reflect a prioritisation of the task...
- Walter (4/19) Dec 15 2003 ;)
It seems that any version later than 8.37 cannot be piped to another process. Specifically, I tend to use the command "dmc | grep -i blahblah" when looking for a command option. On 8.38+, this just puts a "Error: No files specified" to stderr. Weird.
Dec 12 2003
"Matthew Wilson" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message news:brc2vt$1pdk$1 digitaldaemon.com...It seems that any version later than 8.37 cannot be piped to another process. Specifically, I tend to use the command "dmc | grep -i blahblah" when looking for a command option. On 8.38+, this just puts a "Error: No files specified" to stderr. Weird.If you're using my grep.exe, it doesn't read from stdin, hence the message.
Dec 12 2003
Ah. It must be different paths. (I normally use the Borland one) Any reason why your grep couldn't be "enhanced"? :) Matthew "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:brcqtl$2sm4$1 digitaldaemon.com..."Matthew Wilson" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message news:brc2vt$1pdk$1 digitaldaemon.com...filesIt seems that any version later than 8.37 cannot be piped to another process. Specifically, I tend to use the command "dmc | grep -i blahblah" when looking for a command option. On 8.38+, this just puts a "Error: Nomessage.specified" to stderr. Weird.If you're using my grep.exe, it doesn't read from stdin, hence the
Dec 12 2003
"Matthew Wilson" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message news:brdl85$12to$1 digitaldaemon.com...Ah. It must be different paths. (I normally use the Borland one) Any reason why your grep couldn't be "enhanced"?Nobody seems to care <g>. It's a simple program I wrote because none of the other greps would work right on binary files.
Dec 13 2003
theAh. It must be different paths. (I normally use the Borland one) Any reason why your grep couldn't be "enhanced"?Nobody seems to care <g>. It's a simple program I wrote because none ofother greps would work right on binary files.I'd find it useful. Can you add it to the list?
Dec 13 2003
"Matthew Wilson" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message news:brgfis$5od$1 digitaldaemon.com...Sure!theAh. It must be different paths. (I normally use the Borland one) Any reason why your grep couldn't be "enhanced"?Nobody seems to care <g>. It's a simple program I wrote because none ofother greps would work right on binary files.I'd find it useful. Can you add it to the list?
Dec 14 2003
ofAh. It must be different paths. (I normally use the Borland one) Any reason why your grep couldn't be "enhanced"?Nobody seems to care <g>. It's a simple program I wrote because noneDoes your enthusiasm for the adding reflect a prioritisation of the task? ;)theSure!other greps would work right on binary files.I'd find it useful. Can you add it to the list?
Dec 15 2003
"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> "Matthew Wilson" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message news:brjtrg$25rp$1 digitaldaemon.com...;) No <g>. Bug reports come first.ofAh. It must be different paths. (I normally use the Borland one) Any reason why your grep couldn't be "enhanced"?Nobody seems to care <g>. It's a simple program I wrote because noneDoes your enthusiasm for the adding reflect a prioritisation of the task?theSure!other greps would work right on binary files.I'd find it useful. Can you add it to the list?
Dec 15 2003