• Chris Nicholson-Sauls (6/6) Nov 22 2006 Any chance of DMDScript being updated to take advantage of D's recent ch...
• Dan Lewis (3/3) Dec 06 2006 That would be fantastic, especially if the server-side ran with an
• Walter Bright (3/5) Dec 09 2006 At the moment, it looks like it'll have to be post-1.0. I'll be lucky
• Chris Nicholson-Sauls (5/11) Dec 09 2006 That's perfectly fine, considering what you've been doing with D lately....

Chris Nicholson-Sauls <ibisbasenji gmail.com> writes:

Any chance of DMDScript being updated to take advantage of D's recent changes? 
Or is this 
maybe a post-D-1.0 intention?  I'd like to use DMDScript for an upcoming
project of mine, 
and would like to see it running at its true optimum.  :)

Concept: an Ajax engine using ECMAScript for both client and server side code,
using JSON 
as the communication format.  Woo.

-- Chris Nicholson-Sauls

Dan Lewis <murpsoft hotmail.com> writes:

That would be fantastic, especially if the server-side ran with an
asp-equivalent api on lighttpd.

I was rather excited about the prospect of that myself.

Walter Bright <newshound digitalmars.com> writes:

Chris Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
 Any chance of DMDScript being updated to take advantage of D's recent 
 changes?  Or is this maybe a post-D-1.0 intention?

At the moment, it looks like it'll have to be post-1.0. I'll be lucky 
just to get D ready!

Chris Nicholson-Sauls <ibisbasenji gmail.com> writes:

Walter Bright wrote:
 Chris Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
 Any chance of DMDScript being updated to take advantage of D's recent 
 changes?  Or is this maybe a post-D-1.0 intention?

 
 At the moment, it looks like it'll have to be post-1.0. I'll be lucky 
 just to get D ready!

That's perfectly fine, considering what you've been doing with D lately.  :) 
So long as 
DMDScript isn't abandoned or permanently back-burnered I'll be perfectly happy
to wait. 
It might be best to do this project with a stable D/1.0 anyhow.

-- Chris Nicholson-Sauls