• Neal Becker (21/21) Mar 06 2007 I'm having trouble trying to build gdc-0.23 on x86_64 (fc6). I need to ...
• =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_F_Bj=F6rklund?= (10/16) Mar 06 2007 It seems to have built OK on Fedora Core 5, so maybe your
• Neal Becker (3/24) Mar 06 2007 Darn. If someone would build gdc-0.23 on linux x86_64 with -fPIC
• Neal Becker (12/32) Mar 06 2007 I installed
• Ingo Oeser (22/32) Jul 10 2007 Run into the same problem.
• David Friedman (10/35) Mar 06 2007 For whatever reason, the cc1d executable is picking up the built version...
• Neal Becker (4/47) Mar 07 2007 Doesn't help. Not only that, but this time I tried building on a FC5 x8...

Neal Becker <ndbecker2 gmail.com> writes:

I'm having trouble trying to build gdc-0.23 on x86_64 (fc6).  I need to do
this to get libgphobos built with -fPIC.

Here's what I tried:

1. tar xjf gcc-4.1.1.tar.bz2 
2. cd gcc-4.1.1/gcc
3. tar xjf ~/gdc-0.23-src.tar.bz2 
4. cd ..
5. ./gcc/d/setup-gcc.sh 
6. ./configure --prefix=/opt/gdc --enable-languages=c,d,c++ && make
[chug...]
checking
If /home/nbecker/gcc-4.1.1/host-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc/gdc
-B/home/nbecker/gcc-4.1.1/host-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc/
-B/opt/gdc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/opt/gdc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem
/opt/gdc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/include -isystem
/opt/gdc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/sys-include
can compile D
sources... /home/nbecker/gcc-4.1.1/host-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc/cc1d:
/home/nbecker/gcc-4.1.1/host-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc/libgcc_s.so.1:
version `GCC_4.2.0' not found (required by /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6)
no
configure: error: can't compile D sources!
make[1]: *** [configure-target-libphobos] Error 1

That 'GCC_4.2.0' sounds suspicious.  I'm guessing it picked up the system
gcc and libstdc++ instead of the one from the build tree.

What did I do wrong?

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_F_Bj=F6rklund?= <afb algonet.se> writes:

Neal Becker wrote:

 I'm having trouble trying to build gdc-0.23 on x86_64 (fc6).  I need to do
 this to get libgphobos built with -fPIC.

[...]
 That 'GCC_4.2.0' sounds suspicious.  I'm guessing it picked up the system
 gcc and libstdc++ instead of the one from the build tree.
 
 What did I do wrong?

It seems to have built OK on Fedora Core 5, so maybe your
system compiler is too new to support building GDC with ?

"An existing C++ compiler (even if you use make bootstrap)."
seems to indicate it will use the system libstdc++, but it
would be nice to have this clarified... (and perhaps lifted,
if you build the C++ language in addition to just C and D ?)

Otherwise I guess we'll just have to wait for GCC 4.2 support.

--anders

Neal Becker <ndbecker2 gmail.com> writes:

Anders F Björklund wrote:

 Neal Becker wrote:
 
 I'm having trouble trying to build gdc-0.23 on x86_64 (fc6).  I need to
 do this to get libgphobos built with -fPIC.

 [...]
 That 'GCC_4.2.0' sounds suspicious.  I'm guessing it picked up the system
 gcc and libstdc++ instead of the one from the build tree.
 
 What did I do wrong?

 
 It seems to have built OK on Fedora Core 5, so maybe your
 system compiler is too new to support building GDC with ?
 
 "An existing C++ compiler (even if you use make bootstrap)."
 seems to indicate it will use the system libstdc++, but it
 would be nice to have this clarified... (and perhaps lifted,
 if you build the C++ language in addition to just C and D ?)
 
 Otherwise I guess we'll just have to wait for GCC 4.2 support.
 
 --anders

Darn.  If someone would build gdc-0.23 on linux x86_64 with -fPIC
libgphobos, I wouldn't have to go through this.

Neal Becker <ndbecker2 gmail.com> writes:

Anders F Björklund wrote:

 Neal Becker wrote:
 
 I'm having trouble trying to build gdc-0.23 on x86_64 (fc6).  I need to
 do this to get libgphobos built with -fPIC.

 [...]
 That 'GCC_4.2.0' sounds suspicious.  I'm guessing it picked up the system
 gcc and libstdc++ instead of the one from the build tree.
 
 What did I do wrong?

 
 It seems to have built OK on Fedora Core 5, so maybe your
 system compiler is too new to support building GDC with ?
 
 "An existing C++ compiler (even if you use make bootstrap)."
 seems to indicate it will use the system libstdc++, but it
 would be nice to have this clarified... (and perhaps lifted,
 if you build the C++ language in addition to just C and D ?)
 
 Otherwise I guess we'll just have to wait for GCC 4.2 support.
 

I installed 
compat-gcc-34-c++-3.4.6-4
compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-61
compat-gcc-34-3.4.6-4

Then (with clean gcc-4.1.1 source) ran:

CC=gcc34 CXX=g++34 ./configure --prefix=/opt/gdc --enable-languages=c,d,c++
&& make

This should have picked up the gcc34 compiler and libstdc++, but it didn't. 
It still gave the same failure.  It still refers to
(required by /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.)
which it should not have used.

Ingo Oeser <ioe-news rameria.de> writes:

Anders F Björklund wrote:

 Neal Becker wrote:
 
 I'm having trouble trying to build gdc-0.23 on x86_64 (fc6).  I need to
 do this to get libgphobos built with -fPIC.

 [...]
 That 'GCC_4.2.0' sounds suspicious.  I'm guessing it picked up the system
 gcc and libstdc++ instead of the one from the build tree.


 It seems to have built OK on Fedora Core 5, so maybe your
 system compiler is too new to support building GDC with ?

Run into the same problem.

Workaround is:
- backup existing libstc++ from /usr/lib/ && ldconfig
- move the just built libstdc++  there && ldconfig
- build and install/package gdc
- move backed up libstdc++ back to /usr/lib && ldconfig

 Otherwise I guess we'll just have to wait for GCC 4.2 support.

Just beating the compiler to do that at the moment :-)

My steps so far:
- started with gdc-0.23-devel branch
- fixed line-endings as Gregor suggested :-)
- used DMD 1.018 patch from Gregor and 

- ported patches from David to gcc-4.2
- replaces various instanced of build() with build2() or build3()
- used common option framework in GCC

Latest problem: "gdc: unknown spec function 'd-all-sources'" when
gdc tries to built libphobos. Can I built the d-all-sources functionality
with "-combine" in newer gcc?

Any help is appreciated. I'll publish my changes as patches like 
David provides later. I run Linux/Ubuntu Feisty Fawn.

Best Regards

Ingo Oeser

David Friedman <dvdfrdmn users.ess-eff.net> writes:

Neal Becker wrote:
 I'm having trouble trying to build gdc-0.23 on x86_64 (fc6).  I need to do
 this to get libgphobos built with -fPIC.
 
 Here's what I tried:
 
 1. tar xjf gcc-4.1.1.tar.bz2 
 2. cd gcc-4.1.1/gcc
 3. tar xjf ~/gdc-0.23-src.tar.bz2 
 4. cd ..
 5. ./gcc/d/setup-gcc.sh 
 6. ./configure --prefix=/opt/gdc --enable-languages=c,d,c++ && make
 [chug...]
 checking
 If /home/nbecker/gcc-4.1.1/host-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc/gdc
-B/home/nbecker/gcc-4.1.1/host-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc/
-B/opt/gdc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/opt/gdc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem
/opt/gdc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/include -isystem
/opt/gdc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/sys-include
 can compile D
 sources... /home/nbecker/gcc-4.1.1/host-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc/cc1d:
/home/nbecker/gcc-4.1.1/host-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc/libgcc_s.so.1:
 version `GCC_4.2.0' not found (required by /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6)
 no
 configure: error: can't compile D sources!
 make[1]: *** [configure-target-libphobos] Error 1
 
 That 'GCC_4.2.0' sounds suspicious.  I'm guessing it picked up the system
 gcc and libstdc++ instead of the one from the build tree.
 
 What did I do wrong?

For whatever reason, the cc1d executable is picking up the built version 
of libgcc.so instead of the system libgcc.so.  The build scripts may be 
messing with LD_LIBRARY_PATH.

Try building GCC outside of the source directory:

cd ..
mkdir BUILD
cd BUILD
../gcc-4.1.1/configure ... && make

David

Neal Becker <ndbecker2 gmail.com> writes:

David Friedman wrote:

 Neal Becker wrote:
 I'm having trouble trying to build gdc-0.23 on x86_64 (fc6).  I need to
 do this to get libgphobos built with -fPIC.
 
 Here's what I tried:
 
 1. tar xjf gcc-4.1.1.tar.bz2
 2. cd gcc-4.1.1/gcc
 3. tar xjf ~/gdc-0.23-src.tar.bz2
 4. cd ..
 5. ./gcc/d/setup-gcc.sh
 6. ./configure --prefix=/opt/gdc --enable-languages=c,d,c++ && make
 [chug...]
 checking
 If /home/nbecker/gcc-4.1.1/host-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc/gdc
 -B/home/nbecker/gcc-4.1.1/host-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc/
 -B/opt/gdc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/
 -B/opt/gdc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem
 /opt/gdc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/include -isystem
 /opt/gdc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/sys-include can compile D sources...
 /home/nbecker/gcc-4.1.1/host-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc/cc1d:
 /home/nbecker/gcc-4.1.1/host-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc/libgcc_s.so.1:
 version `GCC_4.2.0' not found (required by /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6) no
 configure: error: can't compile D sources! make[1]: ***
 [configure-target-libphobos] Error 1
 
 That 'GCC_4.2.0' sounds suspicious.  I'm guessing it picked up the system
 gcc and libstdc++ instead of the one from the build tree.
 
 What did I do wrong?

 
 For whatever reason, the cc1d executable is picking up the built version
 of libgcc.so instead of the system libgcc.so.  The build scripts may be
 messing with LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
 
 Try building GCC outside of the source directory:
 
 cd ..
 mkdir BUILD
 cd BUILD
 ../gcc-4.1.1/configure ... && make
 
 David

Doesn't help.  Not only that, but this time I tried building on a FC5 x86_64
machine.  I got the same result.  What am I doing that's different then the
way gdc-0.23-x86_64-linux-gcc-4.1.1.tar.bz2 was built?