www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

D.gnu - new release?

reply u <a where.com> writes:
I noticed that GDC in cvs has been updated to D 2.014

But unfortunately D 2.014 has a bug that I cannot use it:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2154

Is there a plan for a new release? the last release 0.24 is about 1 year ago.
Or anyone know how to update the latest front-end of GDC from DMD sources?
Aug 07 2008
next sibling parent reply Vincent Richomme <forumer anonymous.com> writes:
u a écrit :

 I noticed that GDC in cvs has been updated to D 2.014
 
 But unfortunately D 2.014 has a bug that I cannot use it:
 
 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2154
 
 Is there a plan for a new release? the last release 0.24 is about 1 year ago.
 Or anyone know how to update the latest front-end of GDC from DMD sources?
 


It would be also a good idea to incorporate gcc 4.2.x and 4.3.x patch 
that some people have posted here...
Aug 07 2008
parent Moritz Warning <moritzwarning web.de> writes:
On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:15:41 +0200, Vincent Richomme wrote:


 u a écrit :

 I noticed that GDC in cvs has been updated to D 2.014
 
 But unfortunately D 2.014 has a bug that I cannot use it:
 
 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2154
 
 Is there a plan for a new release? the last release 0.24 is about 1
 year ago. Or anyone know how to update the latest front-end of GDC from
 DMD sources?
 


 It would be also a good idea to incorporate gcc 4.2.x and 4.3.x patch
 that some people have posted here...


I have the impression that those patches are fragmented.
Maybe someone could look them up/merge them and test them?
Aug 07 2008
prev sibling parent reply "Koroskin Denis" <2korden gmail.com> writes:
On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:28:24 +0400, u <a where.com> wrote:


 I noticed that GDC in cvs has been updated to D 2.014

 But unfortunately D 2.014 has a bug that I cannot use it:

 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3D2154

 Is there a plan for a new release? the last release 0.24 is about 1 ye=


ar  =


 ago.
 Or anyone know how to update the latest front-end of GDC from DMD  =



 sources?


Not sure if it is a bug or not.
You are trying to access a non-static method. Try one of these solutions=
:

1) Make the method static:

class A {
   public static string toString() {
     return "";
   }
}

2) change your test code:

...
static if (is(typeof((new E()).toString()) : string)) {
...


Both work for me.
Aug 07 2008
parent reply u <a where.com> writes:
== Quote from Koroskin Denis (2korden gmail.com)'s article

 On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:28:24 +0400, u <a where.com> wrote:


 Not sure if it is a bug or not.
 You are trying to access a non-static method. Try one of these solutions


My intention is to test if a certain method/attribute exist for a particular
class; not the actual method invocation on an real object (created statically).

Or this should be done in a different way in D?

BTW, my old code is accept by the latest DMD 2.017 compiler; however, even it
generate binary, the behavior is hard to understand (see the attached file in):

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2274



 Aug 07 2008



  parent  "Koroskin Denis" <2korden gmail.com>  writes:


On Fri, 08 Aug 2008 04:16:38 +0400, u <a where.com> wrote:


 =3D=3D Quote from Koroskin Denis (2korden gmail.com)'s article

 On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:28:24 +0400, u <a where.com> wrote:


 Not sure if it is a bug or not.
 You are trying to access a non-static method. Try one of these soluti=




ons

 My intention is to test if a certain method/attribute exist for a  =



 particular
 class; not the actual method invocation on an real object (created  =



 statically).

 Or this should be done in a different way in D?


Yes, you should do it differently.



 BTW, my old code is accept by the latest DMD 2.017 compiler; however, =


 =


 even it
 generate binary, the behavior is hard to understand (see the attached =


 =


 file in):

 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3D2274


I already answered.



 Aug 07 2008