• Marco Leise (9/9) Jan 02 2017 Did the gdc executable name change? I tried to build the
• Marco Leise (7/14) Jan 02 2017 Never mind, I see it now. Must have been sleepy yesterday.

Marco Leise <Marco.Leise gmx.de> writes:

Did the gdc executable name change? I tried to build the
2.068.2 FE + gcc-4.9 tag on gcc-4.9.4 and it installed as
"gdc" while all other compiler binaries installed in triplet
format (e.g. x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-c++) with "c++" being a symlink.
I remember it being that way for gdc, too.
(I'm using Gentoo Linux's gcc ebuild (install script)
patched with gdc, if that makes a difference.)

-- 
Marco

Marco Leise <Marco.Leise gmx.de> writes:

Am Mon, 2 Jan 2017 12:49:47 +0100
schrieb Marco Leise <Marco.Leise gmx.de>:

 Did the gdc executable name change? I tried to build the
 2.068.2 FE + gcc-4.9 tag on gcc-4.9.4 and it installed as
 "gdc" while all other compiler binaries installed in triplet
 format (e.g. x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-c++) with "c++" being a symlink.
 I remember it being that way for gdc, too.
 (I'm using Gentoo Linux's gcc ebuild (install script)
 patched with gdc, if that makes a difference.)

Never mind, I see it now. Must have been sleepy yesterday.
Thanks for the great release and especially the shared Phobos
library.

-- 
Marco