• jerro (3/3) Apr 20 2013 Is there any chance @attribute("always_inline") and
• Iain Buclaw (9/10) Apr 20 2013 @attribute("noinline") will be added to GDC? It would be nice to be able...
• jerro (4/7) Apr 20 2013 Personally, I'm fine with the names noinline and always_inline.
• Iain Buclaw (6/15) May 13 2013 And it's in:
• jerro (1/1) May 14 2013 Great!

"jerro" <a a.com> writes:

Is there any chance  attribute("always_inline") and 
 attribute("noinline") will be added to GDC? It would be nice to 
be able to control inlining.

Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw ubuntu.com> writes:

On Apr 20, 2013 5:10 PM, "jerro" <a a.com> wrote:
 Is there any chance  attribute("always_inline") and

 attribute("noinline") will be added to GDC? It would be nice to be able to
control inlining.

Can do. Now we are freed from the shackles of GCC attributes, we can give
some of the attributes better or alternative names.

Regards
-- 
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';

"jerro" <a a.com> writes:

 Can do.

That would be nice :)

 Now we are freed from the shackles of GCC attributes, we can 
 give some of the attributes better or alternative names.

Personally, I'm fine with the names noinline and always_inline. 
If you are looking for alternative names, one option would be to 
use forceinline instead of always_inline.

Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw ubuntu.com> writes:

On 20 April 2013 19:17, jerro <a a.com> wrote:

 Can do.

 That would be nice :)


  Now we are freed from the shackles of GCC attributes, we can give some of
 the attributes better or alternative names.

 Personally, I'm fine with the names noinline and always_inline. If you are
 looking for alternative names, one option would be to use forceinline
 instead of always_inline.


And it's in:

https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/commit/3e16d4d7673e4b3b8750df8bc92ce853199a2e78

-- 
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';

"jerro" <a a.com> writes:

Great!