D.gnu - Packaging GDC
- Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eg==?= (13/13) Jan 18 2016 Hi!
- Dicebot (23/36) Jan 18 2016 1)
- Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eg==?= (8/20) Jan 18 2016 Ok, I guess I will have to use the same GCC versions as the base
Hi! I'm working on packaging GDC for openSUSE, and I have a few questions. Is it possible to make the build process install only D related files, for example cc1d, but not cc1? If the above works (or I manually exclude generic GCC files from the package), will the D specific binaries be compatible with generic GCC binaries/libs from other GCC versions? I'm asking this because I'd rather not have to make the GDC package depend on the distribution's default GCC packages, because then I would have to match the GCC versions across the different openSUSE versions... Any hints?
Jan 18 2016
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:58:52 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:Hi! I'm working on packaging GDC for openSUSE, and I have a few questions. Is it possible to make the build process install only D related files, for example cc1d, but not cc1? If the above works (or I manually exclude generic GCC files from the package), will the D specific binaries be compatible with generic GCC binaries/libs from other GCC versions? I'm asking this because I'd rather not have to make the GDC package depend on the distribution's default GCC packages, because then I would have to match the GCC versions across the different openSUSE versions... Any hints?1) About not having gcc as dependency - no, as far as I have understood so far, gcc backend is not designed not be used as library for building independent compilers, it only works as a platform which provides set of supported languages. There are plenty of shared libraries/tools between different gcc-based compilers which would conflict if installed all together. And using different gcc version from distribution default gcc is a good way to screw people systems in a very hideous ways :) 2) However if you do use the same base GCC version as existing distro gcc there is no need to package common stuff like cc1 (it would conflict) - you can only package D additions and specify system gcc package as dependency. This is what I do on Arch Linux: https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/tree/trunk?h=packages/gdc (see PKGBUILD for bash script which builds/packages stuff) As you can see actual GDC essentials come down to this: install -D -m755 $srcdir/gcc-build/gcc/gdc $pkgdir/usr/bin/gdc install -D -m755 $srcdir/gcc-build/gcc/cc1d $pkgdir/usr/lib/gcc/$CHOST/$pkgver/cc1d install -D -m755 $srcdir/GDMD/dmd-script $pkgdir/usr/bin/gdmd
Jan 18 2016
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 14:31:03 UTC, Dicebot wrote:However if you do use the same base GCC version as existing distro gcc there is no need to package common stuff like cc1 (it would conflict) - you can only package D additions and specify system gcc package as dependency.Ok, I guess I will have to use the same GCC versions as the base distro, and try to match their configuration as closely as possible, to avoid incompatibilities.This is what I do on Arch Linux: https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/tree/ runk?h=packages/gdc (see PKGBUILD for bash script which builds/packages stuff) As you can see actual GDC essentials come down to this: install -D -m755 $srcdir/gcc-build/gcc/gdc $pkgdir/usr/bin/gdc install -D -m755 $srcdir/gcc-build/gcc/cc1d $pkgdir/usr/lib/gcc/$CHOST/$pkgver/cc1d install -D -m755 $srcdir/GDMD/dmd-script $pkgdir/usr/bin/gdmdThanks for this! That's actually a nice idea not to call `make install`, but instead package the compiled files directly. I'll have to try this, should make things a bit easier compared to deleting all the unwanted files.
Jan 18 2016