D.gnu - [Issue 1230] New: std.math.poly asm segfaults
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (21/21) May 12 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1230
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (4/4) Jun 28 2007 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1230
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (5/5) Jan 24 2008 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1230
- d-bugmail puremagic.com (12/12) Sep 03 2012 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1230
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1230
Summary: std.math.poly asm segfaults
Product: DGCC aka GDC
Version: 0.23
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
AssignedTo: dvdfrdmn users.sf.net
ReportedBy: larsivar igesund.net
The std.math.poly function segfaults on Linux. Can be tested by running the
unittests for that module. The unittest passes if the asm block is disabled.
The asm works fine with DMD (no segfaults), but Don Clugston says:
"It's clear that the asm code for poly() is buggy - it assumes a frame pointer
in EBP, but the ABI spec does not mandate the use of frame pointers."
Tested with GDC 0.23 and latest svn.
The issue has a corresponding ticket for Tango,
http://www.dsource.org/projects/tango/ticket/467
--
May 12 2007
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1230 I'll adjust the doc to mandate the setting up of EBP, unless 'naked' is used. --
Jun 28 2007
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1230 This is presumably due to GDC not following the D calling convention at all, which is a major PITA. --
Jan 24 2008
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1230
Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw ubuntu.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
D_InlineAsm (and the D Inline Assembler implementation) is no longer part of
GDC.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Sep 03 2012









d-bugmail puremagic.com 