• vladislavp (9/9) Jul 18 2019 Hello, I am looking for help using betterC with GDC
• Eugene Wissner (14/23) Jul 18 2019 Iain:
• Iain Buclaw (5/11) Jul 18 2019 Yes, that is using gcc to compile D code, and no that is not a typo. :-)
• vladislavp (3/17) Jul 19 2019 Thank you Ian, Eugene.

vladislavp <vladislavp outlook.com> writes:

Hello, I am looking for help using betterC with GDC
(after this, my next step was to see if I can use wxWigdets with 
GDC betterC without
  wxD wrappers)

This question is essentially same as below from 2018( it did not 
have any answers).
https://forum.dlang.org/thread/usdqpbusosanlsugwbip forum.dlang.org

If anyone would help with guidance on the above, very much 
appreciated.

Eugene Wissner <belka caraus.de> writes:

On Thursday, 18 July 2019 at 14:29:36 UTC, vladislavp wrote:
 Hello, I am looking for help using betterC with GDC
 (after this, my next step was to see if I can use wxWigdets 
 with GDC betterC without
  wxD wrappers)

 This question is essentially same as below from 2018( it did 
 not have any answers).
 https://forum.dlang.org/thread/usdqpbusosanlsugwbip forum.dlang.org

 If anyone would help with guidance on the above, very much 
 appreciated.

Iain:

`-fexceptions`, `-frtti`, and `-fmoduleinfo` control individual 
implicit Exception, TypeInfo, and ModuleInfo code generation, and 
`-nophoboslib` tells the driver to no bother attempting to link a 
phobos library.
All are wrapped together in a `-fdruntime` convenience switch, to 
which `-fno-druntime` turns off all of the above.

You can get away with:

module object;
extern(C) int main() { return 0; }

As a minimal program and it will just compile, no fancy switches 
required.
gcc test.d && ./a.out

Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw gdcproject.org> writes:

On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 at 18:15, Eugene Wissner via D.gnu
<d.gnu puremagic.com> wrote:
 You can get away with:

 module object;
 extern(C) int main() { return 0; }

 As a minimal program and it will just compile, no fancy switches
 required.
 gcc test.d && ./a.out

Yes, that is using gcc to compile D code, and no that is not a typo. :-)

-- 
Iain

vladislavp <vladislavp outlook.com> writes:

On Thursday, 18 July 2019 at 18:50:07 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
 On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 at 18:15, Eugene Wissner via D.gnu 
 <d.gnu puremagic.com> wrote:
 You can get away with:

 module object;
 extern(C) int main() { return 0; }

 As a minimal program and it will just compile, no fancy 
 switches
 required.
 gcc test.d && ./a.out

 Yes, that is using gcc to compile D code, and no that is not a 
 typo. :-)

Thank you Ian, Eugene.
I got it.