• =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_F_Bj=F6rklund?= (15/25) Jan 01 2005 Is it wise to use the same variables for
• Lars Ivar Igesund (4/40) Jan 01 2005 Note that when A-A-P get gdc support (whenever anyone cares to test it
• =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_F_Bj=F6rklund?= (6/8) Jan 02 2005 Why A-A-P over SCons, or one of the other Python hacks ? (just curious)
• Sebastian Beschke (7/15) Jan 02 2005 I think A-A-P has some more functionality, or at least higher aims, than...
• Lars Ivar Igesund (18/21) Jan 02 2005 Ehm, it's syntax is more highlevel, IMHO. Also, many of it's ideas are

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_F_Bj=F6rklund?= <afb algonet.se> writes:

Is it wise to use the same variables for
the different syntax of compiler flags ?

Sometimes I use the "gdc" compiler, and
sometimes I use the dmd wrapper instead.
But if I put in a Makefile, then I must
remember to use the correct flags syntax...


Q: Would it be easier to *not* use the same
DFLAGS setting for two compilers, in make ?

I was thinking something like this:
 CC=gcc
 CFLAGS=-O2
 
 CXX=g++
 CXXFLAGS=-O2
 
 DC=gdc
 DCFLAGS=-O2 -frelease

 DMD=dmd
 DFLAGS=-O -release

I agree that "DFLAGS" is the best name for it
(same as CFLAGS), but unfortunately it's taken.
And I guess DMDFLAGS is not really an option ;)


Or am I just complicating it? Maybe I am the only
one getting the two mixed up, and it can stay asis...

--anders

Lars Ivar Igesund <larsivar igesund.net> writes:

Anders F Björklund wrote:
 Is it wise to use the same variables for
 the different syntax of compiler flags ?
 
 Sometimes I use the "gdc" compiler, and
 sometimes I use the dmd wrapper instead.
 But if I put in a Makefile, then I must
 remember to use the correct flags syntax...
 
 
 Q: Would it be easier to *not* use the same
 DFLAGS setting for two compilers, in make ?
 
 I was thinking something like this:
 
 CC=gcc
 CFLAGS=-O2

 CXX=g++
 CXXFLAGS=-O2

 DC=gdc
 DCFLAGS=-O2 -frelease

 DMD=dmd
 DFLAGS=-O -release

 
 
 I agree that "DFLAGS" is the best name for it
 (same as CFLAGS), but unfortunately it's taken.
 And I guess DMDFLAGS is not really an option ;)
 
 
 Or am I just complicating it? Maybe I am the only
 one getting the two mixed up, and it can stay asis...
 
 --anders

Note that when A-A-P get gdc support (whenever anyone cares to test it 
enough), it will expect DMD style flags and convert them where needed.

Lars Ivar Igesund

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_F_Bj=F6rklund?= <afb algonet.se> writes:

Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:

 Note that when A-A-P get gdc support (whenever anyone cares to test it 
 enough), it will expect DMD style flags and convert them where needed.

Why A-A-P over SCons, or one of the other Python hacks ? (just curious)

I think most of the D projects uses DMD and DFLAGS, and not gdc style...
(which should work just fine with GDC, using the "dmd" wrapper script)

Which was why I thought the xFLAGS variable for gdc should be renamed ?

--anders

Sebastian Beschke <s.beschke gmx.de> writes:

Anders F Björklund wrote:
 Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
 
 Note that when A-A-P get gdc support (whenever anyone cares to test it 
 enough), it will expect DMD style flags and convert them where needed.

 
 
 Why A-A-P over SCons, or one of the other Python hacks ? (just curious)
 

I think A-A-P has some more functionality, or at least higher aims, than 
SCons (Downloading, publishing...). The last time I tried it (which was 
about a year ago, I think) it didn't work very well, but maybe it would 
be time to try again. I've always thought the SConstruct file syntax was 
a bit clumsy, and SCons is slow.

-Sebastian

Lars Ivar Igesund <larsivar igesund.net> writes:

Anders F Björklund wrote:
 Why A-A-P over SCons, or one of the other Python hacks ? (just curious)

Ehm, it's syntax is more highlevel, IMHO. Also, many of it's ideas are 
taken from SCons, refining them. Apart from that, I know to little of 
SCons to comment.

I find A-A-P syntax at least as powerful as that used by make and much 
more easy on the eye. In addition to being scriptable by Python where 
needed.

 I think most of the D projects uses DMD and DFLAGS, and not gdc style...
 (which should work just fine with GDC, using the "dmd" wrapper script)

Good point, A-A-P could use the dmd wrapper when using gdc. Then again, 
A-A-P have generalized some flags such that they must be translated for 
any compiler. By using the dmd wrapper, they would then be translated 
twice. Whether this practice is good, might be questionable, although I 
find the current decisions sound. Also, it might be possible to finetune 
the gdc tool in A-A-P if the wrapper ain't used. (BTW, it handle 
compilation, linking (of exes, dlls (sos) and libs) and even more if 
possible through the compiler itself or auxiliary tools. E.g. on 
Windows, DMD can produce import libraries (using link.exe), something 
which is handled by an A-A-P variable.

Lars Ivar Igesund