• Pablo De Napoli (20/20) Mar 27 2004 Hi!
• Walter (3/18) Mar 27 2004 It should be under a dual gpl/artistic license. I'll see about fixing it...

Pablo De Napoli <Pablo_member pathlink.com> writes:

Hi! 
 
Walter: I would like to ask you a question? What is the 
license of
Phobos? 
 
It seems that under the license that comes with DMD redistribution
is not allow.  
 
It would be nice if you could release phobos source code
under a free software license (for instance, LGPL) 
so that we can use it to
develop free software 
 
(For exmaple, GPL'ed code cannot be linked _legally_
with a 
library whose license doesn't allow redistribution) 
 
Best regards,
Pablo De Napoli 

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:

It should be under a dual gpl/artistic license. I'll see about fixing it.

"Pablo De Napoli" <Pablo_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:c445qi$fnf$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Hi!

 Walter: I would like to ask you a question? What is the
 license of
 Phobos?

 It seems that under the license that comes with DMD redistribution
 is not allow.

 It would be nice if you could release phobos source code
 under a free software license (for instance, LGPL)
 so that we can use it to
 develop free software

 (For exmaple, GPL'ed code cannot be linked _legally_
 with a
 library whose license doesn't allow redistribution)

 Best regards,
 Pablo De Napoli