D.gnu - Does anybody use GCC 3.3 and 3.4?
- David Friedman (5/5) May 27 2006 Maintaining support for three different versions of GCC is cumbersome
- =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_F_Bj=F6rklund?= (3/7) May 27 2006 Mac OS X 10.3 (and 10.2) use GCC 3.3, but have problems with templates.
- Thomas Kuehne (10/14) May 28 2006 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
- Robert Jones (7/14) Jun 02 2006 I am a cygwin user who compiled gcc 4.0.2. So I am not concerned with
Maintaining support for three different versions of GCC is cumbersome and I have yet to support 4.1.x series. Obviously, MinGW and Cygwin users need 3.4, but is there a need for 3.4 beyond this? Is anyone using 3.3? David
May 27 2006
David Friedman wrote:Maintaining support for three different versions of GCC is cumbersome and I have yet to support 4.1.x series. Obviously, MinGW and Cygwin users need 3.4, but is there a need for 3.4 beyond this? Is anyone using 3.3?Mac OS X 10.3 (and 10.2) use GCC 3.3, but have problems with templates. --anders
May 27 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Friedman schrieb am 2006-05-27:Maintaining support for three different versions of GCC is cumbersome and I have yet to support 4.1.x series. Obviously, MinGW and Cygwin users need 3.4, but is there a need for 3.4 beyond this? Is anyone using 3.3?Gentoo currently uses 3.4.5/3.4.6. Thomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFEeV3x3w+/yD4P9tIRApPRAKDQie5rxVgeNAz1rWpwM5QIuFeMuQCfaVFp AkcojR9UZvOHem7rVNfxnpQ= =SIbh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
May 28 2006
David Friedman said the following on 5/27/2006 1:20 PM:Maintaining support for three different versions of GCC is cumbersome and I have yet to support 4.1.x series. Obviously, MinGW and Cygwin users need 3.4, but is there a need for 3.4 beyond this? Is anyone using 3.3? DavidI am a cygwin user who compiled gcc 4.0.2. So I am not concerned with 3.x support. Not so sure of others. And, David, It's nice to know you are still alive and working on gdc. -- Robert Jones robertjones21 hotpop.com
Jun 02 2006