www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

D.gnu - compiler does not complain no required return value

reply z gg.com writes:
http://www.digitalmars.com/drn-bin/wwwnews?digitalmars.D.bugs/4837

Instead, the generated binary will abort at run-time and give misleading
message:


int f() {
return 0;  // gdc Error: AssertError Failure rtn.d(3); dmd Aborted
}

int main(char[][] args) {
f();
return 0;
}
Aug 26 2005
next sibling parent z gg.com writes:
int f() {
  // return 0;  // gdc Error: AssertError Failure rtn.d(3); dmd Aborted


---^^
need to comment out line 3 to see the error.


}

int main(char[][] args) {
f();
return 0;
}
Aug 26 2005
prev sibling parent reply Stewart Gordon <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> writes:
z gg.com wrote:

 http://www.digitalmars.com/drn-bin/wwwnews?digitalmars.D.bugs/4837


<snip>

Thank you for confessing your sin.

http://smjg.port5.com/faqs/usenet/xpost.html

Stewart.

-- 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS/M d- s:- a->--- UB  P+ L E  W++  N+++ o K- w++  O? M V? PS- PE- Y? 
PGP- t- 5? X? R b DI? D G e++>++++ h-- r-- !y
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox.  Please keep replies on 
the 'group where everyone may benefit.
Aug 26 2005
parent reply z gg.com writes:
Thank you for confessing your sin.

http://smjg.port5.com/faqs/usenet/xpost.html


(Yes, it is intentionally done!  Thank you for mis-interpreting it.)

I'm cross-posting to make sure that gdc guys know this is a common bug.

Ideally, we have 2 compilers now, so we should have 3 bug lists:

D.gdc.bugs
D.dmd.bugs
D.gdc-dmd-common.bugs
Aug 26 2005
parent Stewart Gordon <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> writes:
z gg.com wrote:

 Thank you for confessing your sin.

 http://smjg.port5.com/faqs/usenet/xpost.html


 
 (Yes, it is intentionally done!  Thank you for mis-interpreting it.)
 
 I'm cross-posting to make sure that gdc guys know this is a common bug.


<snip>

If you'd followed the link above, you'd know that you haven't 
crossposted.  You've multiposted.

Stewart.

-- 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS/M d- s:- a->--- UB  P+ L E  W++  N+++ o K- w++  O? M V? PS- PE- Y? 
PGP- t- 5? X? R b DI? D G e++>++++ h-- r-- !y
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox.  Please keep replies on 
the 'group where everyone may benefit.
Aug 31 2005