D.gnu - GCC 4.0 released
- Brad Beveridge (11/11) Apr 21 2005 Hello all (and especially David :)
- David Friedman (6/18) Apr 24 2005 I think I have most of the changes required for 4.0 done, but have not
- =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Thomas_K=FChne?= (16/16) Apr 24 2005 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
- David Friedman (3/24) Apr 24 2005 It's allready in 11pre1! Grep on 'GCC_VER.*40'.
- Thomas Kuehne (11/24) Apr 26 2005 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hello all (and especially David :) now that GCC 4.0 has been released, should GDC start moving toward supporting it? Please don't take this as an attempt to pester anyone, I know that time is a precious thing and I'm not asking anyone to go out of their way. I am interested in tinkering with GDC + GCC4.0 myself, and I was wondering what might be involved with getting the D frontend working with GCC? I know that one of the major issues is that code generation is now based from SSA trees, what are some of the other stumbling blocks? Thanks Brad
Apr 21 2005
Brad Beveridge wrote:Hello all (and especially David :) now that GCC 4.0 has been released, should GDC start moving toward supporting it? Please don't take this as an attempt to pester anyone, I know that time is a precious thing and I'm not asking anyone to go out of their way. I am interested in tinkering with GDC + GCC4.0 myself, and I was wondering what might be involved with getting the D frontend working with GCC? I know that one of the major issues is that code generation is now based from SSA trees, what are some of the other stumbling blocks? Thanks BradI think I have most of the changes required for 4.0 done, but have not tried to build it yet. There are probably a lot little things that need to be fixed. The only major problem I see now is that the tricks I used for inline assembly probably won't work anymore. David
Apr 24 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Friedman wrote: | I think I have most of the changes required for 4.0 done, but have not | tried to build it yet. There are probably a lot little things that | need to be fixed. The only major problem I see now is that the tricks | I used for inline assembly probably won't work anymore. Any chances to see your progress via some read-only access? I'd be really interrested to take a look or 2. *g* Thomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) iD8DBQFCa8+L3w+/yD4P9tIRAgy5AJ4v2peavAH+pHu3oLwRrU03qXcv6gCgtZF0 2KERX+0CU3nxMkYdkqIW8Zg= =6YDD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Apr 24 2005
Thomas Kühne wrote:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Friedman wrote: | I think I have most of the changes required for 4.0 done, but have not | tried to build it yet. There are probably a lot little things that | need to be fixed. The only major problem I see now is that the tricks | I used for inline assembly probably won't work anymore. Any chances to see your progress via some read-only access? I'd be really interrested to take a look or 2. *g* Thomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) iD8DBQFCa8+L3w+/yD4P9tIRAgy5AJ4v2peavAH+pHu3oLwRrU03qXcv6gCgtZF0 2KERX+0CU3nxMkYdkqIW8Zg= =6YDD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----It's allready in 11pre1! Grep on 'GCC_VER.*40'. David
Apr 24 2005
Thomas Kuehne <thomas-dloop kuehne.thisisspam.cn> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Friedman schrieb am Sun, 24 Apr 2005 14:51:18 -0400:Thomas Kühne wrote:Thanks! How could I miss that *g* Thomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFCbin93w+/yD4P9tIRArkBAJ95ciOwtuaGKDlQlREpH0hoZEClXQCgwNWH QsQs4KX9PAxDzOWqRF5Fcy8= =aFj8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----David Friedman wrote: | I think I have most of the changes required for 4.0 done, but have not | tried to build it yet. There are probably a lot little things that | need to be fixed. The only major problem I see now is that the tricks | I used for inline assembly probably won't work anymore. Any chances to see your progress via some read-only access? I'd be really interrested to take a look or 2. *g* ThomasIt's allready in 11pre1! Grep on 'GCC_VER.*40'.
Apr 26 2005