• Karl Bochert (10/10) Dec 04 2002 Would it be possible to allow command-line options without
• Walter (3/13) Dec 12 2002 That's a good idea. -Walter

Karl Bochert <kbochert copper.net> writes:

Would it be possible to allow command-line options without
 the '='?  The watcom compiler, for instance, allows the use of


I am aware of the use of shell.exe, but it appears to require
operation from a dos box, lest its console disappear.

I would prefer to be able to just double-click a batch file
to build, rather than opening a console and typing in
the command and target.

A minor nuisance that would require minor effort to fix.

Karl Bochert

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:

That's a good idea. -Walter

"Karl Bochert" <kbochert copper.net> wrote in message
news:1103_1039068254 bose...
 Would it be possible to allow command-line options without
  the '='?  The watcom compiler, for instance, allows the use of


 I am aware of the use of shell.exe, but it appears to require
 operation from a dos box, lest its console disappear.

 I would prefer to be able to just double-click a batch file
 to build, rather than opening a console and typing in
 the command and target.

 A minor nuisance that would require minor effort to fix.

 Karl Bochert