• Don Stewart (5/5) May 21 2002 Are false & true reserved words ?
• Russ Lewis (9/9) May 21 2002 They are keywords. This is in the "Lexical Grammar" page:
• Walter (5/14) May 21 2002 Try:
• OddesE (17/22) May 23 2002 'enum
• Walter (3/11) May 23 2002 true and false are defined and are keywords.

"Don Stewart" <donald.m.stewart btinternet.com> writes:

Are false & true reserved words ?

I was trying to set up an enum with false and true, but I keep getting 'enum
member expected'.

If I change it to False and True it works.

Don

Russ Lewis <spamhole-2001-07-16 deming-os.org> writes:

They are keywords.  This is in the "Lexical Grammar" page:

http://digitalmars.com/d/lex.html

I hope that somebody makes the docs searchable; as it is, it's really hard to
find the "exact right answer" if you don't know where to look.

--
The Villagers are Online! villagersonline.com

.[ (the fox.(quick,brown)) jumped.over(the dog.lazy) ]
.[ (a version.of(English).(precise.more)) is(possible) ]
?[ you want.to(help(develop(it))) ]

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:

Try:

    www.digitalmars.com/advancedsearch.html


"Russ Lewis" <spamhole-2001-07-16 deming-os.org> wrote in message
news:3CEACB47.3363A5B3 deming-os.org...
 They are keywords.  This is in the "Lexical Grammar" page:

 http://digitalmars.com/d/lex.html

 I hope that somebody makes the docs searchable; as it is, it's really hard

to
 find the "exact right answer" if you don't know where to look.

 --
 The Villagers are Online! villagersonline.com

 .[ (the fox.(quick,brown)) jumped.over(the dog.lazy) ]
 .[ (a version.of(English).(precise.more)) is(possible) ]
 ?[ you want.to(help(develop(it))) ]

"OddesE" <OddesE_XYZ hotmail.com> writes:

"Don Stewart" <donald.m.stewart btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:acegn7$28i1$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Are false & true reserved words ?

 I was trying to set up an enum with false and true, but I keep getting

'enum
 member expected'.

 If I change it to False and True it works.

 Don



Aargh Walter, it is already happening!
C's bad old days are creeping back at us.
I already defined TRUE and FALSE... (actually
joking, but I *might* have!)

Could you bring us some clarity on the bool, bit,
false, true issue?

P.S. See also the thread To bool or not to bool,
that's the question...


--
Stijn
OddesE_XYZ hotmail.com
http://OddesE.cjb.net
_________________________________________________
Remove _XYZ from my address when replying by mail

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:

"OddesE" <OddesE_XYZ hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:acjlmp$12p9$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Aargh Walter, it is already happening!
 C's bad old days are creeping back at us.
 I already defined TRUE and FALSE... (actually
 joking, but I *might* have!)

 Could you bring us some clarity on the bool, bit,
 false, true issue?

 P.S. See also the thread To bool or not to bool,
 that's the question...

true and false are defined and are keywords.