• Mikael Haapakoski (3/3) May 10 2005 while i tried to make int array[1000][1000][1000] compiler gave error,
• Thomas (4/7) May 10 2005 Note:
• Derek Parnell (19/22) May 10 2005 Maybe because static arrays are created on the stack, your application

Mikael Haapakoski <mikael.haapakoski gmail.com> writes:

while i tried to make int array[1000][1000][1000] compiler gave error, 
with array litlle bigger than [510][510][2] compiler halts. why so? if i 
want to use arrays such big, do i have to use malloc?

Thomas <thomas no.wherer> writes:

Mikael Haapakoski schrieb am Tue, 10 May 2005 17:41:11 +0300:
 while i tried to make int array[1000][1000][1000] compiler gave error, 
 with array litlle bigger than [510][510][2] compiler halts. why so? if i 
 want to use arrays such big, do i have to use malloc?

Note:
Please post to the "digitalmars.D.learn" newsgroup instead of the
depricated "D" group.

Derek Parnell <derek psych.ward> writes:

On Tue, 10 May 2005 17:41:11 +0300, Mikael Haapakoski wrote:

 while i tried to make int array[1000][1000][1000] compiler gave error, 
 with array litlle bigger than [510][510][2] compiler halts. why so? if i 
 want to use arrays such big, do i have to use malloc?

Maybe because static arrays are created on the stack, your application
doesn't have enough stack space? Creating a dynamic array might work.

  int[][][] X;
  X.length = 1000;
  for(int i = 0; i < X.length; i++)
  {
    X[i].length = 1000;
    for(int j = 0; j < X[i].length; j++)
        X[i][j].length = 1000;
  }

Or maybe you can create one dimensional array and do your own indexing...

  int[1000*1000*1000] X;


Just out of curiosity, and this is not a criticism, but why does one need
such large arrays in RAM?



-- 
Derek
Melbourne, Australia
11/05/2005 9:15:04 AM