D - What is missing for 1.0 (was: the root Object, and printf)
- Ant (18/18) Apr 07 2004 So what is missing so we can call it 1.0?
- Walter (4/21) Apr 07 2004 If you've got workarounds for std.zip and std.date, can you take a look ...
- Ant (6/9) Apr 07 2004 I don't.
- kinghajj (5/9) Apr 07 2004 I hate this too: why doesn't the compiler keep checking for errors?
- Walter (3/12) Apr 08 2004 The linux front end is at the same version as the windows one.
- Kris (3/21) Apr 09 2004 Object.print, and it's use of printf :-)
- School (6/39) Apr 10 2004 I personally hate "%.*s" "%d" in the first arg of printing something
- Kris (4/6) Apr 10 2004 Ahh. Different topic School. The reference here is about the root Object
- Stewart Gordon (19/31) Apr 10 2004 That should be in a separate "language" section.
- Kris (4/5) Apr 10 2004 Stewart; would you be interested in perusing the Dsc.io package?
- Stewart Gordon (6/12) Apr 11 2004 If I had a clue where to find it, I'd take a look.
- Kris (13/25) Apr 11 2004 OT:
-
Stewart Gordon
(9/11)
Apr 14 2004
- Kris (8/19) Apr 14 2004 I'm sorry Stewart,
- Kris (3/21) Apr 10 2004 Oh ... complete debug-symbols for classes, arrays, etc
- Ant (5/7) Apr 10 2004 yes.
- Brad Anderson (2/15) Apr 10 2004
- Ant (7/23) Apr 10 2004 I disagree. We need shared libs and debug before
- Brad Anderson (4/38) Apr 10 2004 Ant,
- =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Julio_C=E9sar_Carrascal_Urquijo?= (4/12) Apr 17 2004 language:
- Matthew (3/15) Apr 18 2004 I strongly agree with this one.
So what is missing so we can call it 1.0? (excluding obvious bugs) dmd: - interfaces - clean compiler messages - compiler don't give up on first error - array literal expressions --------- phobos: - at least the linux version has to catchup to windows! - severe bugs (like std.zip and std.date) obviously the OO guys can't live without the full implementation of the interfaces as Kris referred and Burton has noticed before. for now I can't remember anything else but my projects are filled with work arround solutions for old problems. Ant
Apr 07 2004
"Ant" <Ant_member pathlink.com> wrote in message news:c51n04$11q0$1 digitaldaemon.com...So what is missing so we can call it 1.0? (excluding obvious bugs) dmd: - interfaces - clean compiler messages - compiler don't give up on first error - array literal expressions --------- phobos: - at least the linux version has to catchup to windows! - severe bugs (like std.zip and std.date) obviously the OO guys can't live without the full implementation of the interfaces as Kris referred and Burton has noticed before. for now I can't remember anything else but my projects are filled with work arround solutions for old problems.If you've got workarounds for std.zip and std.date, can you take a look at the sources to them and suggest a fix?
Apr 07 2004
On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 15:23:13 -0700, Walter wrote:If you've got workarounds for std.zip and std.date, can you take a look at the sources to them and suggest a fix?I don't. maybe I'll take a look at it anyway... I can't imagine the problem with std.date being complex... (but, I have many ideas and so little time...) Ant
Apr 07 2004
"Ant" <duitoolkit yahoo.ca> wrote in message news:pan.2004.04.08.02.05.54.917379 yahoo.ca...On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 15:23:13 -0700, Walter wrote:atIf you've got workarounds for std.zip and std.date, can you take a lookI'd appreciate it!the sources to them and suggest a fix?I don't. maybe I'll take a look at it anyway... I can't imagine the problem with std.date being complex... (but, I have many ideas and so little time...)
Apr 07 2004
On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 20:03:45 -0700, Walter wrote:"Ant" <duitoolkit yahoo.ca> wrote in message news:pan.2004.04.08.02.05.54.917379 yahoo.ca...I'm happy to say that I send the corrections to both problems to Walter. AntOn Wed, 07 Apr 2004 15:23:13 -0700, Walter wrote:atIf you've got workarounds for std.zip and std.date, can you take a lookI'd appreciate it!the sources to them and suggest a fix?I don't. maybe I'll take a look at it anyway... I can't imagine the problem with std.date being complex... (but, I have many ideas and so little time...)
Apr 08 2004
- clean compiler messages - compiler don't give up on first errorI hate this too: why doesn't the compiler keep checking for errors? You've made a C/C++ compiler that works fine in this area, so why can't the D compiler?phobos: - at least the linux version has to catchup to windows!YES! Also, the linux front-end needs to be updated too: last I checked, it was still at version 0.77
Apr 07 2004
"kinghajj" <kinghajj_member pathlink.com> wrote in message news:c5226d$1k1g$1 digitaldaemon.com...The linux front end is at the same version as the windows one.- clean compiler messages - compiler don't give up on first errorI hate this too: why doesn't the compiler keep checking for errors? You've made a C/C++ compiler that works fine in this area, so why can't the D compiler?phobos: - at least the linux version has to catchup to windows!YES! Also, the linux front-end needs to be updated too: last I checked, it was still at version 0.77
Apr 08 2004
Object.print, and it's use of printf :-) "Ant" <Ant_member pathlink.com> wrote in message news:c51n04$11q0$1 digitaldaemon.com...So what is missing so we can call it 1.0? (excluding obvious bugs) dmd: - interfaces - clean compiler messages - compiler don't give up on first error - array literal expressions --------- phobos: - at least the linux version has to catchup to windows! - severe bugs (like std.zip and std.date) obviously the OO guys can't live without the full implementation of the interfaces as Kris referred and Burton has noticed before. for now I can't remember anything else but my projects are filled with work arround solutions for old problems. Ant
Apr 09 2004
Kris said:Object.print, and it's use of printf :-) "Ant" <Ant_member pathlink.com> wrote in message news:c51n04$11q0$1 digitaldaemon.com...I personally hate "%.*s" "%d" in the first arg of printing something out. Yet I am more comfortable with C++'s iostream or python's approach. -- School, yet another nickname for anonymous. :D ;-DSo what is missing so we can call it 1.0? (excluding obvious bugs) dmd: - interfaces - clean compiler messages - compiler don't give up on first error - array literal expressions --------- phobos: - at least the linux version has to catchup to windows! - severe bugs (like std.zip and std.date) obviously the OO guys can't live without the full implementation of the interfaces as Kris referred and Burton has noticed before. for now I can't remember anything else but my projects are filled with work arround solutions for old problems. Ant
Apr 10 2004
"School" <school users.sf.net> wrote in message news:c58dmf$2p1f$1 digitaldaemon.com...I personally hate "%.*s" "%d" in the first arg of printing something out. Yet I am more comfortable with C++'s iostream or python's approach.Ahh. Different topic School. The reference here is about the root Object having a reference to printf embedded within it.
Apr 10 2004
Ant wrote:So what is missing so we can call it 1.0? (excluding obvious bugs) dmd: - interfaces - clean compiler messages - compiler don't give up on first error - array literal expressionsThat should be in a separate "language" section. - Array arithmetic operations--------- phobos: - at least the linux version has to catchup to windows! - severe bugs (like std.zip and std.date)Silly holes in phobos: - std.file - copy function - std.date - functions to get/set/construct by components (year, month, day, hour, minute, second....) - probably others.... - a decent I/O system (what are your thoughts on this Walter?) Some waking up of the status column on http://www.wikiservice.at/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?FeatureRequestList.... I'll probably set up a "Pending peeves" section on Wiki4D soon, maybe on my personal page for now since they're the things I personally feel need dealing with. Maybe some official "to do for 1.0" list should be set up at some point.... Stewart. -- My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox. Please keep replies on on the 'group where everyone may benefit.
Apr 10 2004
"Stewart Gordon" <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> wrote in message news:c598ie$u0r$1 digitaldaemon.com...- a decent I/O system (what are your thoughts on this Walter?)Stewart; would you be interested in perusing the Dsc.io package? - Kris
Apr 10 2004
Kris wrote:"Stewart Gordon" <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> wrote in message news:c598ie$u0r$1 digitaldaemon.com...If I had a clue where to find it, I'd take a look. Stewart. -- My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox. Please keep replies on on the 'group where everyone may benefit.- a decent I/O system (what are your thoughts on this Walter?)Stewart; would you be interested in perusing the Dsc.io package?
Apr 11 2004
OT: It's home is at dsource.org, but it's still going through a kind of "under the radar" testing phase. Dsc is actually a family of three layered packages: io, http-server, and servlet-style framework. I will probably try to get the io package checked-in to dsource.org today, while the other two will perhaps lie-low a while longer. I'll email you a current zip file of all three, though I'll need your address to do so (perhaps you could ping me, via the address given?). I'd like to ask that you provide some feedback in return: good, bad, or ugly -- all of it is valuable. - Kris "Stewart Gordon" <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> wrote in message news:c5brpe$1mjd$1 digitaldaemon.com...Kris wrote:"Stewart Gordon" <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> wrote in message news:c598ie$u0r$1 digitaldaemon.com...If I had a clue where to find it, I'd take a look. Stewart. -- My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox. Please keep replies on on the 'group where everyone may benefit.- a decent I/O system (what are your thoughts on this Walter?)Stewart; would you be interested in perusing the Dsc.io package?
Apr 11 2004
Kris wrote: <snip>I'll email you a current zip file of all three, though I'll need your address to do so (perhaps you could ping me, via the address given?).<snip top of upside-down reply> I'm not sure how or where I'm meant to 'ping' you, nor what "address given" you're referring to. Stewart. -- My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox. Please keep replies on on the 'group where everyone may benefit.
Apr 14 2004
I'm sorry Stewart, I meant, if you send an email to the address given in my posts (without all the ".dot.dot.dot.dot" cruft), then I'll send you a zip of the latest Dsc packages. In the meantime, I'll send to the yahoo address and hope you receive .... - Kris "Stewart Gordon" <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> wrote in message news:c5k3os$2gce$1 digitaldaemon.com...Kris wrote: <snip>I'll email you a current zip file of all three, though I'll need your address to do so (perhaps you could ping me, via the address given?).<snip top of upside-down reply> I'm not sure how or where I'm meant to 'ping' you, nor what "address given" you're referring to. Stewart. -- My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox. Please keep replies on on the 'group where everyone may benefit.
Apr 14 2004
Oh ... complete debug-symbols for classes, arrays, etc "Ant" <Ant_member pathlink.com> wrote in message news:c51n04$11q0$1 digitaldaemon.com...So what is missing so we can call it 1.0? (excluding obvious bugs) dmd: - interfaces - clean compiler messages - compiler don't give up on first error - array literal expressions --------- phobos: - at least the linux version has to catchup to windows! - severe bugs (like std.zip and std.date) obviously the OO guys can't live without the full implementation of the interfaces as Kris referred and Burton has noticed before. for now I can't remember anything else but my projects are filled with work arround solutions for old problems. Ant
Apr 10 2004
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:46:06 -0800, Kris wrote:Oh ... complete debug-symbols for classes, arrays, etcyes. and debug support in linux. and shared libs in linux! Ant
Apr 10 2004
All three of these would be bonus. Ant wrote:On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:46:06 -0800, Kris wrote:Oh ... complete debug-symbols for classes, arrays, etcyes. and debug support in linux. and shared libs in linux! Ant
Apr 10 2004
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 12:47:00 -0500, Brad Anderson wrote:All three of these would be bonus.I disagree. We need shared libs and debug before it can be called 1.0! (At the very least shared libs.) I know that there is limited support for debug in linux. (I never could make it work) AntAnt wrote:On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:46:06 -0800, Kris wrote:Oh ... complete debug-symbols for classes, arrays, etcyes. and debug support in linux. and shared libs in linux! Ant
Apr 10 2004
Ant, I was agreeing with you. BA Ant wrote:On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 12:47:00 -0500, Brad Anderson wrote:All three of these would be bonus.I disagree. We need shared libs and debug before it can be called 1.0! (At the very least shared libs.) I know that there is limited support for debug in linux. (I never could make it work) AntAnt wrote:On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:46:06 -0800, Kris wrote:Oh ... complete debug-symbols for classes, arrays, etcyes. and debug support in linux. and shared libs in linux! Ant
Apr 10 2004
Ant wrote:So what is missing so we can call it 1.0? (excluding obvious bugs) dmd: - interfaces - clean compiler messages - compiler don't give up on first error - array literal expressionslanguage: - Property to remove hash keys: myHash.remove("aKey") instead of delete myHash["aKey"]
Apr 17 2004
I strongly agree with this one. "Julio C�sar Carrascal Urquijo" <adnoctum phreaker.net> wrote in message news:c5s70u$2cj8$1 digitaldaemon.com...Ant wrote:So what is missing so we can call it 1.0? (excluding obvious bugs) dmd: - interfaces - clean compiler messages - compiler don't give up on first error - array literal expressionslanguage: - Property to remove hash keys: myHash.remove("aKey") instead of delete myHash["aKey"]
Apr 18 2004