• Tony West (7/7) Apr 05 2004 I know this has been raised before, but I'm still unsure of the type of ...
• Phill (11/18) Apr 05 2004 C:\dmd\src\dmd\readme.txt
• C (11/35) Apr 05 2004 All this licensing crap seems like silly PC BS to me. I haven't been =
• Brad Anderson (2/51) Apr 05 2004

Tony West <Tony_member pathlink.com> writes:

I know this has been raised before, but I'm still unsure of the type of license
that applies to both the compiler and libraries.

I was wondering if we could have an entry in the FAQ that goes beyond the "Will
D be open source".  An entry that explains exactly what the licence(s) are, and
what ramifications they will have on the commercial use of D?

Thanks,

Tony

"Phill" <phill pacific.net.au> writes:

C:\dmd\src\dmd\readme.txt

Phill.


"Tony West" <Tony_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:c4rb50$cbf$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 I know this has been raised before, but I'm still unsure of the type of

license
 that applies to both the compiler and libraries.

 I was wondering if we could have an entry in the FAQ that goes beyond the

"Will
 D be open source".  An entry that explains exactly what the licence(s)

are, and
 what ramifications they will have on the commercial use of D?

 Thanks,

 Tony


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.648 / Virus Database: 415 - Release Date: 3/31/2004

C <dont respond.com> writes:

All this licensing crap seems like silly PC BS to me.  I haven't been =

programming that long, has it always been like this ?  Or is this anothe=
r =

unfortunate side effect of the open source communist movement ?

C

On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 20:18:06 +1000, Phill <phill pacific.net.au> wrote:

 C:\dmd\src\dmd\readme.txt

 Phill.


 "Tony West" <Tony_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
 news:c4rb50$cbf$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 I know this has been raised before, but I'm still unsure of the type =


of
 license
 that applies to both the compiler and libraries.

 I was wondering if we could have an entry in the FAQ that goes beyond=


 =

 the

 "Will
 D be open source".  An entry that explains exactly what the licence(s=


)
 are, and
 what ramifications they will have on the commercial use of D?

 Thanks,

 Tony


 ---
 Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
 Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
 Version: 6.0.648 / Virus Database: 415 - Release Date: 3/31/2004



-- =

D Newsgroup.

Brad Anderson <brad dsource.dot.org> writes:

www.sco.com

C wrote:
 All this licensing crap seems like silly PC BS to me.  I haven't been 
 programming that long, has it always been like this ?  Or is this 
 another unfortunate side effect of the open source communist movement ?
 
 C
 
 On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 20:18:06 +1000, Phill <phill pacific.net.au> wrote:
 
 C:\dmd\src\dmd\readme.txt

 Phill.


 "Tony West" <Tony_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
 news:c4rb50$cbf$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 I know this has been raised before, but I'm still unsure of the type of

 license

 that applies to both the compiler and libraries.

 I was wondering if we could have an entry in the FAQ that goes beyond 
 the

 "Will

 D be open source".  An entry that explains exactly what the licence(s)

 are, and

 what ramifications they will have on the commercial use of D?

 Thanks,

 Tony


 ---
 Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
 Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
 Version: 6.0.648 / Virus Database: 415 - Release Date: 3/31/2004