• Stanislav (3/3) Mar 26 2004 sorry for my bad english :)
• Phill (3/6) Mar 26 2004 Can you say that again?
• me_ (3/6) Mar 26 2004 Is the current D compiler good in optimizing?
• Phill (4/11) Mar 26 2004 Dont mind me, I was just being a smartarse :o))
• C (4/20) Mar 26 2004 --
• J Anderson (12/28) Mar 26 2004 You know your not going to get any more answers by posting more times
• Ilya Minkov (7/10) Mar 26 2004 It's not really his fault. He has posted it from the web interface,
• SL (5/20) Mar 26 2004 I had the same problem the first time or two I posted (using the

Stanislav <Stanislav_member pathlink.com> writes:

sorry for my bad english :)
Can i do OpenGL programs in D?
What level of optimization of D?

"Phill" <phill pacific.net.au> writes:

Can you say that again?


"Stanislav" <Stanislav_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:c40ug7$1f6k$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 sorry for my bad english :)
 Can i do OpenGL programs in D?
 What level of optimization of D?

me_ <me__member pathlink.com> writes:

In article <c40vis$1gtu$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Phill says...
Can you say that again?


 Can i do OpenGL programs in D?


Can I use OpenGL in programs written in D.

 What level of optimization of D?


Is the current D compiler good in optimizing?

"Phill" <phill pacific.net.au> writes:

Dont mind me, I was just being a smartarse :o))

Phill.

"me_" <me__member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:c411n2$1k47$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 In article <c40vis$1gtu$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Phill says...
Can you say that again?


 Can i do OpenGL programs in D?


 Can I use OpenGL in programs written in D.

 What level of optimization of D?


 Is the current D compiler good in optimizing?

C <dont respond.com> writes:

lol, it was funny :)


On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 08:55:33 +1100, Phill <phill pacific.net.au> wrote:

 Dont mind me, I was just being a smartarse :o))

 Phill.

 "me_" <me__member pathlink.com> wrote in message
 news:c411n2$1k47$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 In article <c40vis$1gtu$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Phill says...
Can you say that again?


 Can i do OpenGL programs in D?


 Can I use OpenGL in programs written in D.

 What level of optimization of D?


 Is the current D compiler good in optimizing?




-- 
D Newsgroup.

J Anderson <REMOVEanderson badmama.com.au> writes:

Stanislav wrote:

sorry for my bad english :)
Can i do OpenGL programs in D?
What level of optimization of D?

  

You know your not going to get any more answers by posting more times 
but you may annoy a few readers (but not me).  If your using "outlook 
express" or mozilla you can cancel your own messages.


FW:

 How well does it integrate with OpenGL?

Very well, indeed.  Performace wise (you'll need to judge for yourself) 
but it seems to be similar.

glExcess was implemented in D with good results:

 It shows that even in its current alpha state the D compiler plays in 
 the same league with production C/C++ compilers.



 Sure. D compiler is pretty good.
  

 And the binary is smaller, 65% of the original.
   

 since my 'glExcess into D' doesn't support sound and
 FPS(frames per second) display ,so it doesn't mean
 D compiler generate smaller binary than C/C++ compiler.

 by fairly judging , it is almost even.

 yaneurao.

And performace wise so many times better then java (currently).

PS - See my page for D openGL related stuff.

-- 
-Anderson: http://badmama.com.au/~anderson/

Ilya Minkov <minkov cs.tum.edu> writes:

J Anderson schrieb:

 You know your not going to get any more answers by posting more times 
 but you may annoy a few readers (but not me).  If your using "outlook 
 express" or mozilla you can cancel your own messages.

It's not really his fault. He has posted it from the web interface, 
which does not update immediately, but with an interval of a few 
minutes. So he could not see his previous posts. And then probably saw 
each and every one of them at once.

Nontheless, this annoys me and i'm not going to answer him. ;)

-eye

SL <shadowlord13 users.sourceforge.net> writes:

Ilya Minkov wrote:
 J Anderson schrieb:
 
 You know your not going to get any more answers by posting more times 
 but you may annoy a few readers (but not me).  If your using "outlook 
 express" or mozilla you can cancel your own messages.

 
 
 It's not really his fault. He has posted it from the web interface, 
 which does not update immediately, but with an interval of a few 
 minutes. So he could not see his previous posts. And then probably saw 
 each and every one of them at once.
 
 Nontheless, this annoys me and i'm not going to answer him. ;)
 
 -eye

I had the same problem the first time or two I posted (using the 
web-interface), though I only double-posted, instead of 
quintuple-posting (Wow)! I use Thunderbird now instead. It's sooo nice.

-SL