• Vathix (12/12) Mar 17 2004 If we could use ; in enum, would it easily allow version()?
• Walter (3/13) Mar 26 2004 Currently, that is not allowed.
• Ant (7/26) Mar 26 2004 Yes, we know that ;)

Vathix <vathix dprogramming.com> writes:

If we could use ; in enum, would it easily allow version()?


enum Foo
{
    a, b, c;

    version(Speshul)
       d = 9, e, f;
    else
       d = 11, e, f;

    g = 40, h, i,
}


-- 
Christopher E. Miller

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:

"Vathix" <vathix dprogramming.com> wrote in message
news:c3a3ir$2ngm$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 If we could use ; in enum, would it easily allow version()?


 enum Foo
 {
     a, b, c;

     version(Speshul)
        d = 9, e, f;
     else
        d = 11, e, f;

     g = 40, h, i,
 }

Currently, that is not allowed.

Ant <duitoolkit yahoo.ca> writes:

On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 21:42:04 -0800, Walter wrote:

 
 "Vathix" <vathix dprogramming.com> wrote in message
 news:c3a3ir$2ngm$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 If we could use ; in enum, would it easily allow version()?


 enum Foo
 {
     a, b, c;

     version(Speshul)
        d = 9, e, f;
     else
        d = 11, e, f;

     g = 40, h, i,
 }

 
 Currently, that is not allowed.

Yes, we know that ;)

but, is it planed?

this is a suggestion.

(I was about to post the same suggestion the day (and hour)
Vathix posted this)

Ant