• Manfred Nowak (18/18) Feb 26 2004 I have a class C that compiles and runs correctly.
• Walter (1/1) Feb 26 2004 I can't tell without a reproducible code example.
• Manfred Nowak (3/4) Feb 27 2004 Then there is no obvious error. I will try to track it down.
• Manfred Nowak (18/19) Mar 04 2004 I reduced the code to:
• Walter (1/1) Mar 05 2004 Thanks, I'll take it from here.

Manfred Nowak <svv1999 hotmail.com> writes:

I have a class C that compiles and runs correctly.

Now I want to make it type dependent.

C contains a Type that is declared like:
  typedef uint T;

In a first step I move this declaration out of the body of C into the
module level and put a template declaration around the declaration of C
like this:

  typedef uint T;

  template CTemp(T){
    class C{
       ...  //no more typedef for T in here
    }
  }

I instantiate the template and declare the class object like this:

  alias CTemp!(T) TC;

  TC.C  foo= new TC.C( ... parameters for this ... );

What am I doing wrong, that make dmd crash in the semantic3 phase?

So long.

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:

I can't tell without a reproducible code example.

Manfred Nowak <svv1999 hotmail.com> writes:

Walter wrote:

 I can't tell without a reproducible code example.

Then there is no obvious error. I will try to track it down.

So long.

Manfred Nowak <svv1999 hotmail.com> writes:

Walter wrote:
 I can't tell without a reproducible code example.

I reduced the code to:

template CT(T){
  class C{
    const char[][] arrArr=["" ];
  }
}

void main(){
  alias CT!(int) Ct;
  Ct.C c= new Ct.C();
}

While this crashes the untemplated version compiles okay:

class C{
  const char[][] arrArr=["" ];
}

void main(){
  C c= new C();
}

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:

Thanks, I'll take it from here.