• Manfred Nowak (3/3) Feb 19 2004 If `e' is a legal expression, then `( e )' is also one.
• Ant (4/5) Feb 19 2004 I don't think that's always true - not sure.
• Ant (5/10) Feb 19 2004 oh, no, I think the problem was starting a statment with a "("
• Walter (3/6) Feb 23 2004 Good catch. -Walter

Manfred Nowak <svv1999 hotmail.com> writes:

If `e' is a legal expression, then `( e )' is also one.
But there is no rule for it in the specs.

SO long.

Ant <Ant_member pathlink.com> writes:

In article <c12eus$7hu$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Manfred Nowak says...
If `e' is a legal expression, then `( e )' is also one.

I don't think that's always true - not sure.
I'll post it if I find it again.

Ant

Ant <Ant_member pathlink.com> writes:

In article <c12v9c$15ql$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Ant says...
In article <c12eus$7hu$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Manfred Nowak says...
If `e' is a legal expression, then `( e )' is also one.

I don't think that's always true - not sure.
I'll post it if I find it again.

oh, no, I think the problem was starting a statment with a "("
(not sure) It was something I expected to be valid...
I'll post it if I find it again.

Ant

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:

Good catch. -Walter

"Manfred Nowak" <svv1999 hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c12eus$7hu$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 If `e' is a legal expression, then `( e )' is also one.
 But there is no rule for it in the specs.

 SO long.