D - int[][]
- Phill (12/12) Jan 30 2004 Can somebody please explain why this code:
- Phill (6/18) Jan 30 2004 and even stranger this compiles and runs:
- J C Calvarese (12/35) Jan 30 2004 You might try:
- Phill (4/39) Jan 30 2004 Ok thanks! I like exotic :o))
-
Stewart Gordon
(12/20)
Feb 02 2004
- Phill (5/25) Feb 02 2004 Ok I get the picture, thanks.
Can somebody please explain why this code: int[20][2] whatever; whatever[19][0] = 2; gives this error: test.d(6): array index [19] is outside array bounds [0 .. 2] and this code gives the same error: int[2][20] whatever; whatever[0][19] = 2; test.d(6): array index [19] is outside array bounds [0 .. 2] Im still using v0.77 so was it a bug in this ver or am I doing this wrong? Phill.
Jan 30 2004
and even stranger this compiles and runs: int[2][20] test; test[19][0] = 2; Phill. "Phill" <phill pacific.net.au> wrote in message news:bvfd9p$2qef$1 digitaldaemon.com...Can somebody please explain why this code: int[20][2] whatever; whatever[19][0] = 2; gives this error: test.d(6): array index [19] is outside array bounds [0 .. 2] and this code gives the same error: int[2][20] whatever; whatever[0][19] = 2; test.d(6): array index [19] is outside array bounds [0 .. 2] Im still using v0.77 so was it a bug in this ver or am I doing this wrong? Phill.
Jan 30 2004
Phill wrote:Can somebody please explain why this code: int[20][2] whatever; whatever[19][0] = 2; gives this error: test.d(6): array index [19] is outside array bounds [0 .. 2] and this code gives the same error: int[2][20] whatever; whatever[0][19] = 2; test.d(6): array index [19] is outside array bounds [0 .. 2] Im still using v0.77 so was it a bug in this ver or am I doing this wrong? Phill.You might try: int[20][2] whatever; whatever[0][19] = 2; or int whatever[2][20]; whatever[0][19] = 2; It's like this on purpose. I think it's to faciliate porting exotic code from C, but I don't recall any more details. -- Justin http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/
Jan 30 2004
Ok thanks! I like exotic :o)) Phill. "J C Calvarese" <jcc7 cox.net> wrote in message news:bvfeni$2t8u$1 digitaldaemon.com...Phill wrote:Can somebody please explain why this code: int[20][2] whatever; whatever[19][0] = 2; gives this error: test.d(6): array index [19] is outside array bounds [0 .. 2] and this code gives the same error: int[2][20] whatever; whatever[0][19] = 2; test.d(6): array index [19] is outside array bounds [0 .. 2] Im still using v0.77 so was it a bug in this ver or am I doing this wrong? Phill.You might try: int[20][2] whatever; whatever[0][19] = 2; or int whatever[2][20]; whatever[0][19] = 2; It's like this on purpose. I think it's to faciliate porting exotic code from C, but I don't recall any more details. -- Justin http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/
Jan 30 2004
While it was 31/1/04 5:09 am throughout the UK, Phill sprinkled little black dots on a white screen, and they fell thus:Can somebody please explain why this code: int[20][2] whatever; whatever[19][0] = 2; gives this error: test.d(6): array index [19] is outside array bounds [0 .. 2]<snip> So that the syntax is logical. int[20][2] is an array of two int[20]s, not of 20 int[2]s. Declarations then read from right to left, rather than C-style middle to right and then to left, or hopping about as you were thinking of it. Stewart. -- My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox, aside from its being the unfortunate victim of intensive mail-bombing at the moment. Please keep replies on the 'group where everyone may benefit.
Feb 02 2004
Ok I get the picture, thanks. Its just different than I have been using before. Phill. "Stewart Gordon" <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> wrote in message news:bvlmg9$1268$1 digitaldaemon.com...While it was 31/1/04 5:09 am throughout the UK, Phill sprinkled little black dots on a white screen, and they fell thus:Can somebody please explain why this code: int[20][2] whatever; whatever[19][0] = 2; gives this error: test.d(6): array index [19] is outside array bounds [0 .. 2]<snip> So that the syntax is logical. int[20][2] is an array of two int[20]s, not of 20 int[2]s. Declarations then read from right to left, rather than C-style middle to right and then to left, or hopping about as you were thinking of it. Stewart. -- My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox, aside from its being the unfortunate victim of intensive mail-bombing at the moment. Please keep replies on the 'group where everyone may benefit.
Feb 02 2004