D - known bug list I've reported
- yaneurao (22/23) Jan 14 2004 I've reported some bugs.
- Ant (9/24) Jan 15 2004 That's it! that what was making the compiler crash at
- Walter (3/5) Jan 15 2004 Ouch!
- Walter (4/10) Jan 15 2004 I get:
- yaneurao (4/17) Jan 16 2004 DMD 0.78 (Windows version) hangs up here in WindowsXP.
- Walter (4/23) Jan 17 2004 What dmd command line are you using? It does not fail when I try:
- yaneurao (8/14) Jan 17 2004 I tryed:
- Manfred Nowak (10/11) Jan 18 2004 A metoo for win98se(german):
- ahiru (16/18) Jan 18 2004 please try this code.
- dave daveandrews.org (6/24) Jan 19 2004 I had this exact same problem, I believe... I narrowed it down to havin...
I've reported some bugs.
Here is a bug list which is not fixed in DMD 0.78.
If you understand it, then neglect me , Mr.Walter.
1. std.file in Win9x is not fixed.
dmd\src\file.d(55):
useWfuncs = (GetVersion() >= 0x80000000);
it is wrong.
< useWfuncs = !(GetVersion() >= 0x80000000);
is right.
2. GC can't allocate a large buffer in Win98
http://www.digitalmars.com/drn-bin/wwwnews?D/21162
3.struct name crash compiler
http://www.digitalmars.com/drn-bin/wwwnews?D/21027
Sorry , my explanation was not enough.
When I use the struct which name is module name and (at the same time)
struct or class or interface name , compiler would crash :
--- ver.d
module ver;
struct ver {}
--- main.d
private import ver;
ver v; // compiler crash here!
yaneurao.
Jan 14 2004
In article <bu5fgh$11m4$1 digitaldaemon.com>, yaneurao says...
I've reported some bugs.
Here is a bug list which is not fixed in DMD 0.78.
If you understand it, then neglect me , Mr.Walter.
3.struct name crash compiler
http://www.digitalmars.com/drn-bin/wwwnews?D/21027
Sorry , my explanation was not enough.
When I use the struct which name is module name and (at the same time)
struct or class or interface name , compiler would crash :
--- ver.d
module ver;
struct ver {}
--- main.d
private import ver;
ver v; // compiler crash here!
yaneurao.
That's it! that what was making the compiler crash at
some point on leds development! I had to abandone
that version and revert to the previous one.
Any time I make some non trivial change on my
D projects I hold my breath during the compilation...
Ant
leds - light editor for D
http://leds.sourceforge.net
Jan 15 2004
"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> "Ant" <Ant_member pathlink.com> wrote in message news:bu661r$25f0$1 digitaldaemon.com...Any time I make some non trivial change on my D projects I hold my breath during the compilation...Ouch!
Jan 15 2004
"yaneurao" <yaneurao_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:bu5fgh$11m4$1 digitaldaemon.com...
--- ver.d
module ver;
struct ver {}
--- main.d
private import ver;
ver v; // compiler crash here!
I get:
main.d(2): ver is used as a type
Jan 15 2004
In article <bu85jf$2h8i$3 digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says..."yaneurao" <yaneurao_member pathlink.com> wrote in message news:bu5fgh$11m4$1 digitaldaemon.com...DMD 0.78 (Windows version) hangs up here in WindowsXP. Access Violation infomation:--- ver.d module ver; struct ver {} --- main.d private import ver; ver v; // compiler crash here!I get: main.d(2): ver is used as a typeAppName: dmd.exe AppVer: 0.0.0.0 ModName: unknown ModVer: 0.0.0.0 Offset: e8004996yaneurao.
Jan 16 2004
"yaneurao" <yaneurao_member pathlink.com> wrote in message news:bu8mjq$cqk$1 digitaldaemon.com...In article <bu85jf$2h8i$3 digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...What dmd command line are you using? It does not fail when I try: dmd main"yaneurao" <yaneurao_member pathlink.com> wrote in message news:bu5fgh$11m4$1 digitaldaemon.com...DMD 0.78 (Windows version) hangs up here in WindowsXP. Access Violation infomation:--- ver.d module ver; struct ver {} --- main.d private import ver; ver v; // compiler crash here!I get: main.d(2): ver is used as a typeAppName: dmd.exe AppVer: 0.0.0.0 ModName: unknown ModVer: 0.0.0.0 Offset: e8004996yaneurao.
Jan 17 2004
In article <buc8oo$99b$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...I tryed: \dmd\bin\dmd main (main.d and ver.d exist in c:\ ,i.e. c:\main.d , c:\ver.d) I've tested in WindowsXP/2k/98. the results are the same. if I had have compiler source all or debug build version DMD compiler, I could trace and debug compiler's bug by symbolic debugger... yaneurao.DMD 0.78 (Windows version) hangs up here in WindowsXP. Access Violation infomation:What dmd command line are you using? It does not fail when I try: dmd mainAppName: dmd.exe AppVer: 0.0.0.0 ModName: unknown ModVer: 0.0.0.0 Offset: e8004996
Jan 17 2004
yaneurao schrieb:I've tested in WindowsXP/2k/98. the results are the same.A metoo for win98se(german): `dmd main' delivers: | DMD verursachte einen Fehler durch eine ungültige Seite in Modul | <Unbekannt> bei 0000:e8004996. Surprising that the address is the same. So long. -- Fight Spam! Join EuroCAUCE: http://www.euro.cauce.org/ 2EA56D6D4DC41ABA311615946D3248A1
Jan 18 2004
In article <buc8oo$99b$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...
What dmd command line are you using? It does not fail when I try:
dmd main
please try this code.
== mod.d ==
// empty
== test.d ==
import mod;
mod var;
- result:
C:\Documents and Settings\ahiru>dmd -v
Digital Mars D Compiler v0.78
// snip
C:\Documents and Settings\ahiru>dmd -v test
parse test
semantic test
CLASH X(
- ahiru
Jan 18 2004
In article <bufstr$118$1 digitaldaemon.com>, ahiru says...In article <buc8oo$99b$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...I had this exact same problem, I believe... I narrowed it down to having a class declared in a separate d file and then instanciating an object of that class. It did the same on Windows and linux. I sent an email to Walter and I he replied that it was fixed... Can't wait for next release :) -DaveWhat dmd command line are you using? It does not fail when I try: dmd mainplease try this code. == mod.d == // empty == test.d == import mod; mod var; - result: C:\Documents and Settings\ahiru>dmd -v Digital Mars D Compiler v0.78 // snip C:\Documents and Settings\ahiru>dmd -v test parse test semantic test CLASH X( - ahiru
Jan 19 2004