D - implicit conversions
- Carlos Santander B. (34/34) Oct 16 2003 This has been touched before, but anyway...
- Walter (4/19) Oct 27 2003 I'd
This has been touched before, but anyway... Is there a way to get this kind of behavior in D? class Complex { private double re,im; this() { this(r); } this(double r) { this(r,0); } this(double r,double i) { re=r; im=i; } } void main() { Complex x = new Complex(); x=4; //this x=cast(Complex)4; //or maybe even this } I know it can be done explicitly calling the appropiate constructor, but I'd like to also do it like this. ------------------------- Carlos Santander This has been touched before, but anyway... Is there a way to get this kind of behavior in D? class Complex { private double re,im; this() { this(r); } this(double r) { this(r,0); } this(double r,double i) { re=r; im=i; } } void main() { Complex x = new Complex(); x=4; //this x=cast(Complex)4; //or maybe even this } I know it can be done explicitly calling the appropiate constructor, but I'd like to also do it like this. ------------------------- Carlos Santander
Oct 16 2003
"Carlos Santander B." <carlos8294 msn.com> wrote in message news:bmmrol$17vr$1 digitaldaemon.com...This has been touched before, but anyway... Is there a way to get this kind of behavior in D? class Complex { private double re,im; this() { this(r); } this(double r) { this(r,0); } this(double r,double i) { re=r; im=i; } } void main() { Complex x = new Complex(); x=4; //this x=cast(Complex)4; //or maybe even this } I know it can be done explicitly calling the appropiate constructor, butI'dlike to also do it like this.At the moment there isn't a way, but perhaps this should be dealt with.
Oct 27 2003