D - A better name required for the language
- Andrew Marlow (11/11) Aug 17 2003 Pardon me, a relative newcomer to this forum, for saying such a thing BU...
- Ben Hinkle (16/27) Aug 17 2003 I hate to say it but I agree. For me the problem is that whenever I ment...
- Kef Li (9/12) Aug 17 2003 STEVE MERETZKY YEEEAAAHHH!!! ...sorry. Yeah, I'm a Meretzky (designer of...
- Hanford Carr (3/11) Aug 17 2003 If it was called D++ could they laugh then?
- Antti =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syk=E4ri?= (9/13) Aug 17 2003 I guess they also laughed when the "C" language was designed to be the
- Andrew Marlow (2/15) Aug 18 2003
- Matthew Wilson (18/49) Aug 17 2003 People laugh at anything. Anyone think C++ is not risible, if you actual...
- Walter (5/15) Aug 17 2003 featured
- John Reimer (8/13) Aug 17 2003 I don't think it needs changing. I think D is fitting, though some
- Matthew Wilson (1/3) Aug 17 2003 That's a good thing, no? Shake up a few old farts!
- Walter (4/7) Aug 17 2003 One nice thing is it gets peoples' attention in a way that another name
- Kef Li (5/10) Aug 17 2003 Yes, I feel it is an issue. For now I generally call it "Digital Mars D"...
- Jonathan Andrew (9/20) Aug 17 2003 Personally, I like "D", it implies true successorship to the C/C++ thron...
- Walter (17/25) Aug 17 2003 I
- Jeroen van Bemmel (6/9) Aug 17 2003 I have no problem with the name, and renaming it now would do more harm ...
- Walter (6/16) Aug 17 2003 than
- someone somewhere.com (10/12) Aug 18 2003 Hmm, could be. I did find this though:
- Walter (10/23) Aug 18 2003 very
- Sean L. Palmer (13/24) Aug 17 2003 What's wrong with Deimos? Starts with the letter "D", it's a bright sol...
- Rich C (8/12) Aug 17 2003 "Bright" sucks. It sounds even more pretentious than "D". Besides, Time
- Charles Sanders (5/21) Aug 17 2003 Pretentious ? How so, I like the name bright. Demios is also the greek...
- Walter (4/7) Aug 17 2003 god
- Rich C (5/7) Aug 17 2003 It would be like calling the language "smart" or "brilliant" or "best."
- Matthew Wilson (11/26) Aug 17 2003 I think Phobos, Diemos, Bright, and even Walter, should be reserved for
- Andrew Marlow (4/8) Aug 18 2003 That sounds nice but it would be still hard to find on the web since it ...
- Jaime Abreu (6/17) Sep 06 2003 The overall philosophy behind D is to solve practical programming issues...
- John Boucher (5/27) Sep 14 2003 Along with searching for resources and information is searching for jobs...
Pardon me, a relative newcomer to this forum, for saying such a thing BUT.. I think a better language name is needed. D has already been taken countless times, and is very hard to find using most internet search engines. I am sorry I have no better alternative suggestions at present but maybe people will at least agree that it is an issue? It goes without saying that the replacement should be such that web searches will find the language and not whatever else the name might mean. Also it would be good to avoid cute names, in-jokes, blantant allusions to DigitalMars etc etc. I think allusions to Walter Bright would probably be acceptable. After all he did invent it :-) -Andrew Marlow
Aug 17 2003
I hate to say it but I agree. For me the problem is that whenever I mention it at work people start laughing and assume the language isn't "serious". I have no suggestions, though. -Ben ps. and is it just me or does "phobos" remind people of that great Infocom game Leather Goddesses of Phobos? - not that it's a bad thing to be reminded of that game ;-) "Andrew Marlow" <apm35 student.open.ac.uk> wrote in message news:bhnpu9$2hj2$1 digitaldaemon.com...Pardon me, a relative newcomer to this forum, for saying such a thingBUT.. Ithink a better language name is needed. D has already been taken countless times, and is very hard to find using most internet search engines. I amsorry Ihave no better alternative suggestions at present but maybe people will atleastagree that it is an issue? It goes without saying that the replacement should be such that websearcheswill find the language and not whatever else the name might mean. Also itwouldbe good to avoid cute names, in-jokes, blantant allusions to DigitalMarsetcetc. I think allusions to Walter Bright would probably be acceptable.After allhe did invent it :-) -Andrew Marlow
Aug 17 2003
In article <bhnvup$2pk8$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Ben Hinkle says...ps. and is it just me or does "phobos" remind people of that great Infocom game Leather Goddesses of Phobos? - not that it's a bad thing to be reminded of that game ;-)STEVE MERETZKY YEEEAAAHHH!!! ...sorry. Yeah, I'm a Meretzky (designer of Leather Goddesses of Phobos and co-designer of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy) fan, though admittedly I can't stand playing Infocom games for an extended period. I end up just using the hint files. :) See, I was ~born~ in the 80s, so I've been spoiled by all these fancy 2D graphics games. Now 2D games seem to be deprecated...I don't understand! That's like saying an animated movie is stupid because it's not 3D. - Kef
Aug 17 2003
snip I hate to say it but I agree. For me the problem is that whenever I mention it at work people start laughing and assume the language isn't "serious". I have no suggestions, though.If it was called D++ could they laugh then? -Hanford Does C++ == D--?-Andrew Marlow
Aug 17 2003
In article <bhnvup$2pk8$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Ben Hinkle wrote:I hate to say it but I agree. For me the problem is that whenever I mention it at work people start laughing and assume the language isn't "serious". I have no suggestions, though.I guess they also laughed when the "C" language was designed to be the predecessor of "B"... And consider "Linux", now that's one bad joke for a name! Seriously, I'd suppose that the popularity of a language will depend more on the amount of programs written in it that on the amount of hours the marketing department has spent trying to figure out a selling name for it. -Antti
Aug 17 2003
In article <slrnbjvk76.pru.jsykari pulu.hut.fi>, Antti =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syk=E4ri?= says...In article <bhnvup$2pk8$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Ben Hinkle wrote:I hate to say it but I agree. For me the problem is that whenever I mention it at work people start laughing and assume the language isn't "serious". I have no suggestions, though.I guess they also laughed when the "C" language was designed to be the predecessor of "B"... And consider "Linux", now that's one bad joke for a name! Seriously, I'd suppose that the popularity of a language will depend more on the amount of programs written in it that on the amount of hours the marketing department has spent trying to figure out a selling name for it. -Antti
Aug 18 2003
People laugh at anything. Anyone think C++ is not risible, if you actually think about it? In any case, this debate is fruitless. The name is out there, in the communities, and in the development press (I know, because D's been featured in several articles of mine that are coming out shortly), and to change it now will merely confuse and dissuade people. And finally, Walter's chosen it, and (i) we'll not persuade him to change, and (ii) it's his baby. Maybe it'll grow up to be "owned" by us all (the larger dev community, I mean), but he can call it what he wants, and we should respect that. "Ben Hinkle" <bhinkle4 juno.com> wrote in message news:bhnvup$2pk8$1 digitaldaemon.com...I hate to say it but I agree. For me the problem is that whenever Imentionit at work people start laughing and assume the language isn't "serious".Ihave no suggestions, though. -Ben ps. and is it just me or does "phobos" remind people of that great Infocom game Leather Goddesses of Phobos? - not that it's a bad thing to beremindedof that game ;-) "Andrew Marlow" <apm35 student.open.ac.uk> wrote in message news:bhnpu9$2hj2$1 digitaldaemon.com...countlessPardon me, a relative newcomer to this forum, for saying such a thingBUT.. Ithink a better language name is needed. D has already been takenattimes, and is very hard to find using most internet search engines. I amsorry Ihave no better alternative suggestions at present but maybe people willleastitagree that it is an issue? It goes without saying that the replacement should be such that websearcheswill find the language and not whatever else the name might mean. Alsowouldbe good to avoid cute names, in-jokes, blantant allusions to DigitalMarsetcetc. I think allusions to Walter Bright would probably be acceptable.After allhe did invent it :-) -Andrew Marlow
Aug 17 2003
"Matthew Wilson" <matthew stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:bhp6im$1fgp$1 digitaldaemon.com...People laugh at anything. Anyone think C++ is not risible, if you actually think about it? In any case, this debate is fruitless. The name is out there, in the communities, and in the development press (I know, because D's beenfeaturedin several articles of mine that are coming out shortly), and to change it now will merely confuse and dissuade people. And finally, Walter's chosen it, and (i) we'll not persuade him to change, and (ii) it's his baby. Maybe it'll grow up to be "owned" by us all (the larger dev community, I mean), but he can call it what he wants, and we should respect that.I look forward to when D is grown up, standardized, and pretty much belonging to all programmers like C and C++ are.
Aug 17 2003
Andrew Marlow wrote:Pardon me, a relative newcomer to this forum, for saying such a thing BUT.. I think a better language name is needed. D has already been taken countless times, and is very hard to find using most internet search engines. I am sorry I have no better alternative suggestions at present but maybe people will at least agree that it is an issue?I don't think it needs changing. I think D is fitting, though some people seem to have thought the name a presumptious move. Maybe it has been taken countless times, but this time will be the only time that will make it work! (I hope) Didn't slashdot people belabor this issue too? Later, John
Aug 17 2003
I don't think it needs changing. I think D is fitting, though some people seem to have thought the name a presumptious move.That's a good thing, no? Shake up a few old farts!
Aug 17 2003
"Matthew Wilson" <matthew stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:bhp6in$1fgp$2 digitaldaemon.com...One nice thing is it gets peoples' attention in a way that another name would not.I don't think it needs changing. I think D is fitting, though some people seem to have thought the name a presumptious move.That's a good thing, no? Shake up a few old farts!
Aug 17 2003
In article <bhnpu9$2hj2$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Andrew Marlow says...Pardon me, a relative newcomer to this forum, for saying such a thing BUT.. I think a better language name is needed. D has already been taken countless times, and is very hard to find using most internet search engines. I am sorry I have no better alternative suggestions at present but maybe people will at least agree that it is an issue?Yes, I feel it is an issue. For now I generally call it "Digital Mars D" to people unfamiliar with the language, but of course one day this won't be just Digital Mars' language...what to do? - Kef
Aug 17 2003
In article <bhoao1$6h4$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Kef Li says...In article <bhnpu9$2hj2$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Andrew Marlow says...Personally, I like "D", it implies true successorship to the C/C++ throne. I mean, its short, sweet, to the point. Sure, its kind of pretentious, but maybe thats what I like the most about it, and even if others have taken the name, this is better, so it wins :). If I had to pick something else, I would call it something even gutsier, like "Awesome" or "Bad-Ass." I mean, who wouldn't want to tell their boss that they used "Bad-Ass" to code the latest project in? ;) -JonPardon me, a relative newcomer to this forum, for saying such a thing BUT.. I think a better language name is needed. D has already been taken countless times, and is very hard to find using most internet search engines. I am sorry I have no better alternative suggestions at present but maybe people will at least agree that it is an issue?Yes, I feel it is an issue. For now I generally call it "Digital Mars D" to people unfamiliar with the language, but of course one day this won't be just Digital Mars' language...what to do? - Kef
Aug 17 2003
"Jonathan Andrew" <jon ece.arizona.edu> wrote in message news:bhoboj$7se$1 digitaldaemon.com...Personally, I like "D", it implies true successorship to the C/C++ throne.Imean, its short, sweet, to the point. Sure, its kind of pretentious, butmaybethats what I like the most about it, and even if others have taken thename,this is better, so it wins :).The idea that the language "D" is the successor to C goes at least back to 1987. There were long threads on comp.lang.c about "D" back then, I even participated in them. Although one cannot trademark a letter (Zilog tried once long ago!), D being what it is has a claim going way back. I've certainly been thinking about D that long. I understand the problem with googling on the letter D. I usually will google for "D Programming". The full name of D is the "D Programming Language".If I had to pick something else, I would call it something even gutsier, like "Awesome" or "Bad-Ass." I mean, who wouldn'twantto tell their boss that they used "Bad-Ass" to code the latest project in? ;)I tried calling D the "mars" language initially, but everyone kept calling it D. There's just no point in trying to swim up Niagra Falls <g>, so D it is. As you said, it's short, sweet, and to the point.
Aug 17 2003
I understand the problem with googling on the letter D. I usually will google for "D Programming". The full name of D is the "D Programming Language".I have no problem with the name, and renaming it now would do more harm than good. But perhaps you could add a view HTML meta-tags to the D webpages, to help search machines find it. Something like <meta name="keywords" content="D,programming,language,C,C++,Java,system programming">
Aug 17 2003
"Jeroen van Bemmel" <anonymous somewhere.com> wrote in message news:bhouo8$14jg$1 digitaldaemon.com...thanI understand the problem with googling on the letter D. I usually will google for "D Programming". The full name of D is the "D Programming Language".I have no problem with the name, and renaming it now would do more harmgood. But perhaps you could add a view HTML meta-tags to the D webpages,tohelp search machines find it. Something like <meta name="keywords" content="D,programming,language,C,C++,Java,system programming">I was under the impression that search engines ignore meta tags, due to their abuse by too many webmasters.
Aug 17 2003
I was under the impression that search engines ignore meta tags, due to their abuse by too many webmasters.Hmm, could be. I did find this though: http://www.traffick.com/article.asp?aID=105 "Google doesn't completely ignore meta tags as I claimed. They may give a very low weight to keyword tags (we'll never know how much). More importantly, the index will grab a description meta tag as a "fall-through" if a site's home page doesn't contain much if any usable text, nor alt tags on images. Another thing Google does in some cases is to use the description written by a human editor at the Open Directory (http://www.dmoz.org), if the site is listed there." Seems like D could be added to the category 'http://www.dmoz.org/Computers/Programming/Compilers/'
Aug 18 2003
<someone somewhere.com> wrote in message news:bhq0c6$2kie$1 digitaldaemon.com...veryI was under the impression that search engines ignore meta tags, due to their abuse by too many webmasters.Hmm, could be. I did find this though: http://www.traffick.com/article.asp?aID=105 "Google doesn't completely ignore meta tags as I claimed. They may give alow weight to keyword tags (we'll never know how much). More importantly,theindex will grab a description meta tag as a "fall-through" if a site'shome pagedoesn't contain much if any usable text, nor alt tags on images. AnotherthingGoogle does in some cases is to use the description written by a humaneditor atthe Open Directory (http://www.dmoz.org), if the site is listed there." Seems like D could be added to the category 'http://www.dmoz.org/Computers/Programming/Compilers/'It's already here: http://www.dmoz.org/Computers/Programming/Languages/D/ dmoz I think frowns on putting something in in multiple categories.
Aug 18 2003
What's wrong with Deimos? Starts with the letter "D", it's a bright solar object, it ties in to DigitalMars. Someone else suggested calling it "Bright". That's a good name. Sean "Andrew Marlow" <apm35 student.open.ac.uk> wrote in message news:bhnpu9$2hj2$1 digitaldaemon.com...Pardon me, a relative newcomer to this forum, for saying such a thingBUT.. Ithink a better language name is needed. D has already been taken countless times, and is very hard to find using most internet search engines. I amsorry Ihave no better alternative suggestions at present but maybe people will atleastagree that it is an issue? It goes without saying that the replacement should be such that websearcheswill find the language and not whatever else the name might mean. Also itwouldbe good to avoid cute names, in-jokes, blantant allusions to DigitalMarsetcetc. I think allusions to Walter Bright would probably be acceptable.After allhe did invent it :-) -Andrew Marlow
Aug 17 2003
"Sean L. Palmer" <palmer.sean verizon.net> wrote in message news:bhondi$nbe$1 digitaldaemon.com...What's wrong with Deimos? Starts with the letter "D", it's a bright solar object, it ties in to DigitalMars. Someone else suggested calling it "Bright". That's a good name. Sean"Bright" sucks. It sounds even more pretentious than "D". Besides, Time Warner Cable just changed their name to "Bright House." And I'm sure you don't want to be associated with them. Go with your first impulse, I always say. Deimos is the better of your suggestions. Rich C.
Aug 17 2003
"Bright" sucks. It sounds even more pretentious than "D".Pretentious ? How so, I like the name bright. Demios is also the greek god of dread. "Rich C" <no spam.com> wrote in message news:bhoo2v$o5v$1 digitaldaemon.com..."Sean L. Palmer" <palmer.sean verizon.net> wrote in message news:bhondi$nbe$1 digitaldaemon.com...solarWhat's wrong with Deimos? Starts with the letter "D", it's a brightobject, it ties in to DigitalMars. Someone else suggested calling it "Bright". That's a good name. Sean"Bright" sucks. It sounds even more pretentious than "D". Besides, Time Warner Cable just changed their name to "Bright House." And I'm sure you don't want to be associated with them. Go with your first impulse, I always say. Deimos is the better of your suggestions. Rich C.
Aug 17 2003
"Charles Sanders" <sanders-consulting comcast.net> wrote in message news:bhp63h$1es5$1 digitaldaemon.com...god"Bright" sucks. It sounds even more pretentious than "D".Pretentious ? How so, I like the name bright. Demios is also the greekof dread.I thought for a minute you'd written the "geek" god!
Aug 17 2003
"Charles Sanders" <sanders-consulting comcast.net> wrote in message news:bhp63h$1es5$1 digitaldaemon.com...It would be like calling the language "smart" or "brilliant" or "best." I prefer to reserve those adjectives for those that use it. :) Rich C."Bright" sucks. It sounds even more pretentious than "D".Pretentious ? How so, [snip]
Aug 17 2003
I think Phobos, Diemos, Bright, and even Walter, should be reserved for things supporting D Phobos - the rtl Deimos - another library, maybe the DTL? (I was thinking DREAD would be good for the DTL, but I've yet to think of the meanings of the READ part ... ) Bright - the DIDDE Walter - the next generation compiler. It'd mean the Compiler Walter would live on, when our compiler-walter has jogged off this mortal coil. Arf Arf "Rich C" <no spam.com> wrote in message news:bhoo2v$o5v$1 digitaldaemon.com..."Sean L. Palmer" <palmer.sean verizon.net> wrote in message news:bhondi$nbe$1 digitaldaemon.com...solarWhat's wrong with Deimos? Starts with the letter "D", it's a brightobject, it ties in to DigitalMars. Someone else suggested calling it "Bright". That's a good name. Sean"Bright" sucks. It sounds even more pretentious than "D". Besides, Time Warner Cable just changed their name to "Bright House." And I'm sure you don't want to be associated with them. Go with your first impulse, I always say. Deimos is the better of your suggestions. Rich C.
Aug 17 2003
In article <bhondi$nbe$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Sean L. Palmer says...What's wrong with Deimos? Starts with the letter "D", it's a bright solar object, it ties in to DigitalMars. Someone else suggested calling it "Bright". That's a good name. SeanThat sounds nice but it would be still hard to find on the web since it is a common word with an ordinary meaning. -Andrew Marlow
Aug 18 2003
In article <bhq2mk$2npi$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Andrew Marlow says...In article <bhondi$nbe$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Sean L. Palmer says...The overall philosophy behind D is to solve practical programming issues. One of those issues should be the ease of finding related resources and information therefore D should have a different name to make searches easier. I think that Deimos is a good name. D++, Dmd, or Dmos are not bad either. jaime abreuWhat's wrong with Deimos? Starts with the letter "D", it's a bright solar object, it ties in to DigitalMars. Someone else suggested calling it "Bright". That's a good name. SeanThat sounds nice but it would be still hard to find on the web since it is a common word with an ordinary meaning. -Andrew Marlow
Sep 06 2003
In article <bjcr56$279n$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Jaime Abreu says...In article <bhq2mk$2npi$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Andrew Marlow says...Along with searching for resources and information is searching for jobs on Monster and such. John Boucher The King had Humpty pushed.In article <bhondi$nbe$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Sean L. Palmer says...The overall philosophy behind D is to solve practical programming issues. One of those issues should be the ease of finding related resources and information therefore D should have a different name to make searches easier. I think that Deimos is a good name. D++, Dmd, or Dmos are not bad either. jaime abreuWhat's wrong with Deimos? Starts with the letter "D", it's a bright solar object, it ties in to DigitalMars. Someone else suggested calling it "Bright". That's a good name. SeanThat sounds nice but it would be still hard to find on the web since it is a common word with an ordinary meaning. -Andrew Marlow
Sep 14 2003