• Ilya Minkov (11/11) Feb 15 2003 I've tried to build DIG 0.0.8 with newer compiler verions:
• Burton Radons (4/12) Feb 15 2003 I'll be revisiting it today with the latest compiler. There will be one...
• Burton Radons (5/15) Feb 15 2003 Walter, did you also change array append to delete the previous copy if
• Walter (3/7) Feb 15 2003 No, I didn't change that.

Ilya Minkov <midiclub 8ung.at> writes:

I've tried to build DIG 0.0.8 with newer compiler verions:

DMD 0.52 - all examples "disappear" after a few seconds of working; 
dedit gets an "exception: acess violation" a few seconds after start, 
and then disappears as well.
DMD 0.53 - none of examples shows a window.
DMD 0.54 - after fxing the source and getting it to compile, the same 
result as 0.53. :(

All results with win2k.
I have also tried with 0.53 on win98, and got the same result.

Has anyone had more luck?

-i.

Burton Radons <loth users.sourceforge.net> writes:

Ilya Minkov wrote:
 I've tried to build DIG 0.0.8 with newer compiler verions:
 
 DMD 0.52 - all examples "disappear" after a few seconds of working; 
 dedit gets an "exception: acess violation" a few seconds after start, 
 and then disappears as well.
 DMD 0.53 - none of examples shows a window.
 DMD 0.54 - after fxing the source and getting it to compile, the same 
 result as 0.53. :(

I'll be revisiting it today with the latest compiler.  There will be one 
change: gridfitting won't happen until the "display" method is sent to 
whatever top-level control has been changed.

Burton Radons <loth users.sourceforge.net> writes:

Burton Radons wrote:
 Ilya Minkov wrote:
 
 I've tried to build DIG 0.0.8 with newer compiler verions:

 DMD 0.52 - all examples "disappear" after a few seconds of working; 
 dedit gets an "exception: acess violation" a few seconds after start, 
 and then disappears as well.
 DMD 0.53 - none of examples shows a window.
 DMD 0.54 - after fxing the source and getting it to compile, the same 
 result as 0.53. :(


Walter, did you also change array append to delete the previous copy if 
it re-allocates?  What it's failing on is a line I have deleting from an 
append if it changed the pointer.  I should be removing that crap 
anyway, and if that change has been made, then kickass.

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:

"Burton Radons" <loth users.sourceforge.net> wrote in message
news:b2mdl5$2sb5$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Walter, did you also change array append to delete the previous copy if
 it re-allocates?  What it's failing on is a line I have deleting from an
 append if it changed the pointer.  I should be removing that crap
 anyway, and if that change has been made, then kickass.

No, I didn't change that.