• factory (14/14) Feb 14 2003 Compiling the below code will cause the compiler to crash.
• Walter (1/1) Feb 14 2003 Looks like a bug to me. I'll take care of it. -Walter
• factory (11/12) Feb 14 2003 Oh and the following produces a rather strange error message:
• Walter (4/16) Feb 15 2003 int[] def = [ 1, 2, 3 ];

factory <tehdasX optushome.com.au> writes:

  Compiling the below code will cause the compiler to crash. 
  I'm actually assuming that it's correct code too, am I right?

---

typedef int[] tint;

void Set( inout tint array, int newLength )
{
	array.length= newLength;
}

int main()
{
	return 0;
}



-- 
 - Factory, there is no X in my email.

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:

Looks like a bug to me. I'll take care of it. -Walter

factory <tehdasX optushome.com.au> writes:

In article <b2johs$l04$1 digitaldaemon.com>, walter digitalmars.com 
says...
 Looks like a bug to me. I'll take care of it. -Walter

  Oh and the following produces a rather strange error message:

---    

int[] def = { 1, 2, 3 };

int main()
{
	return 0;
}

-- 
 - Factory, there is no X in my email.

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:

int[] def = [ 1, 2, 3 ];

should work. -Walter

"factory" <tehdasX optushome.com.au> wrote in message
news:MPG.18b88c60dc144b16989689 news.digitalmars.com...
 In article <b2johs$l04$1 digitaldaemon.com>, walter digitalmars.com
 says...
 Looks like a bug to me. I'll take care of it. -Walter

   Oh and the following produces a rather strange error message:

 ---

 int[] def = { 1, 2, 3 };

 int main()
 {
 return 0;
 }

 --
  - Factory, there is no X in my email.