D - Anonymous functions?
- Andy Friesen (13/13) Feb 01 2003 Basically, some syntactic sugar for small functions that are only needed...
-
Carlos Santander B.
(52/52)
Feb 01 2003
"Andy Friesen"
escribió en el mensaje - Walter (1/1) Feb 18 2003 Anonymous functions (in some form) are a very good idea. -Walter
- Mark Evans (3/3) Feb 19 2003 Microsoft considered functional language features important enough to en...
Basically, some syntactic sugar for small functions that are only needed for a moment. alias void delegate(int i) Function; Function f = Function { return i * 3 }; Or somesuch. If one wants to get fancy, one could get the compiler to try and inline them when passed as template arguments, which opens the doorway to C++ STL-like algorithms. instance Algorithm(SomeType, Comparer { return a.something > b.something; } ).Sort(somearray); Maybe the syntax isn't so hot, though.
Feb 01 2003
"Andy Friesen" <andy ikagames.com> escribió en el mensaje news:b1h5uk$2omp$1 digitaldaemon.com... | Basically, some syntactic sugar for small functions that are only needed | for a moment. | | alias void delegate(int i) Function; | Function f = Function { return i * 3 }; | | Or somesuch. If one wants to get fancy, one could get the compiler to | try and inline them when passed as template arguments, which opens the | doorway to C++ STL-like algorithms. | | instance Algorithm(SomeType, | Comparer { | return a.something > b.something; | } | ).Sort(somearray); | | Maybe the syntax isn't so hot, though. | What about functions inside other functions (what's the real name for that), like in Delphi? I'm not sure about the syntax, but maybe that could be a workaround (sp?) for anon functions. Or am I getting it wrong? ------------------------- Carlos Santander http://carlos3.netfirms.com/ "Andy Friesen" <andy ikagames.com> escribió en el mensaje news:b1h5uk$2omp$1 digitaldaemon.com... | Basically, some syntactic sugar for small functions that are only needed | for a moment. | | alias void delegate(int i) Function; | Function f = Function { return i * 3 }; | | Or somesuch. If one wants to get fancy, one could get the compiler to | try and inline them when passed as template arguments, which opens the | doorway to C++ STL-like algorithms. | | instance Algorithm(SomeType, | Comparer { | return a.something > b.something; | } | ).Sort(somearray); | | Maybe the syntax isn't so hot, though. | What about functions inside other functions (what's the real name for that), like in Delphi? I'm not sure about the syntax, but maybe that could be a workaround (sp?) for anon functions. Or am I getting it wrong? ------------------------- Carlos Santander http://carlos3.netfirms.com/
Feb 01 2003
Anonymous functions (in some form) are a very good idea. -Walter
Feb 18 2003
Microsoft considered functional language features important enough to enhance NET. D should pay them serious attention. -M. http://research.microsoft.com/projects/ilx/babel01.pdf
Feb 19 2003